122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35441674)
21. Common Decoy Distributions Simplify False Discovery Rate Estimation in Shotgun Proteomics.
Madej D; Wu L; Lam H
J Proteome Res; 2022 Feb; 21(2):339-348. PubMed ID: 34989576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. False discovery rate estimation using candidate peptides for each spectrum.
Lee S; Park H; Kim H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):454. PubMed ID: 36319948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sensitive and Accurate Quantitation of Phosphopeptides Using TMT Isobaric Labeling Technique.
Jiang X; Bomgarden R; Brown J; Drew DL; Robitaille AM; Viner R; Huhmer AR
J Proteome Res; 2017 Nov; 16(11):4244-4252. PubMed ID: 29022350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Target-Decoy-Based False Discovery Rate Estimation for Large-Scale Metabolite Identification.
Wang X; Jones DR; Shaw TI; Cho JH; Wang Y; Tan H; Xie B; Zhou S; Li Y; Peng J
J Proteome Res; 2018 Jul; 17(7):2328-2334. PubMed ID: 29790753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Deep learning embedder method and tool for mass spectra similarity search.
Qin C; Luo X; Deng C; Shu K; Zhu W; Griss J; Hermjakob H; Bai M; Perez-Riverol Y
J Proteomics; 2021 Feb; 232():104070. PubMed ID: 33307250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. LuciPHOr: algorithm for phosphorylation site localization with false localization rate estimation using modified target-decoy approach.
Fermin D; Walmsley SJ; Gingras AC; Choi H; Nesvizhskii AI
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Nov; 12(11):3409-19. PubMed ID: 23918812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. False Discovery Rate Estimation for Hybrid Mass Spectral Library Search Identifications in Bottom-up Proteomics.
Burke MC; Zhang Z; Mirokhin YA; Tchekovskoi DV; Liang Y; Stein SE
J Proteome Res; 2019 Sep; 18(9):3223-3234. PubMed ID: 31364354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A hierarchical MS2/MS3 database search algorithm for automated analysis of phosphopeptide tandem mass spectra.
Xu H; Wang L; Sallans L; Freitas MA
Proteomics; 2009 Apr; 9(7):1763-70. PubMed ID: 19288523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative database search engine analysis on massive tandem mass spectra of pork-based food products for halal proteomics.
Amir SH; Yuswan MH; Aizat WM; Mansor MK; Desa MNM; Yusof YA; Song LK; Mustafa S
J Proteomics; 2021 Jun; 241():104240. PubMed ID: 33894373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. False discovery rates in spectral identification.
Jeong K; Kim S; Bandeira N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012; 13 Suppl 16(Suppl 16):S2. PubMed ID: 23176207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. PhoPepMass: A database and search tool assisting human phosphorylation peptide identification from mass spectrometry data.
Zhang M; Cui H; Chen L; Yu Y; Glocker MO; Xie L
J Genet Genomics; 2018 Jul; 45(7):381-388. PubMed ID: 30055873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Simultaneous quantification of protein phosphorylation sites using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomics: a linear algebra approach for isobaric phosphopeptides.
Xu F; Yang T; Sheng Y; Zhong T; Yang M; Chen Y
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):5452-60. PubMed ID: 25403019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Repeat-Preserving Decoy Database for False Discovery Rate Estimation in Peptide Identification.
Moosa JM; Guan S; Moran MF; Ma B
J Proteome Res; 2020 Mar; 19(3):1029-1036. PubMed ID: 32009416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Correction of errors in tandem mass spectrum extraction enhances phosphopeptide identification.
Hao P; Ren Y; Tam JP; Sze SK
J Proteome Res; 2013 Dec; 12(12):5548-57. PubMed ID: 24147958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimized Workflow for Multiplexed Phosphorylation Analysis of TMT-Labeled Peptides Using High-Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry.
Schweppe DK; Rusin SF; Gygi SP; Paulo JA
J Proteome Res; 2020 Jan; 19(1):554-560. PubMed ID: 31799850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. AIomics: Exploring More of the Proteome Using Mass Spectral Libraries Extended by Artificial Intelligence.
Geer LY; Lapin J; Slotta DJ; Mak TD; Stein SE
J Proteome Res; 2023 Jul; 22(7):2246-2255. PubMed ID: 37232537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Phosphoproteome analysis of human liver tissue by long-gradient nanoflow LC coupled with multiple stage MS analysis.
Han G; Ye M; Liu H; Song C; Sun D; Wu Y; Jiang X; Chen R; Wang C; Wang L; Zou H
Electrophoresis; 2010 Mar; 31(6):1080-9. PubMed ID: 20166139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Linear discriminant analysis-based estimation of the false discovery rate for phosphopeptide identifications.
Du X; Yang F; Manes NP; Stenoien DL; Monroe ME; Adkins JN; States DJ; Purvine SO; Camp DG; Smith RD
J Proteome Res; 2008 Jun; 7(6):2195-203. PubMed ID: 18422353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Decoy methods for assessing false positives and false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics.
Wang G; Wu WW; Zhang Z; Masilamani S; Shen RF
Anal Chem; 2009 Jan; 81(1):146-59. PubMed ID: 19061407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Search and decoy: the automatic identification of mass spectra.
Eisenacher M; Kohl M; Turewicz M; Koch MH; Uszkoreit J; Stephan C
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 893():445-88. PubMed ID: 22665317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
