These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35442526)
1. Review of direct PCR and Rapid DNA approaches to streamline sexual assault kit testing. Harrel M; Holmes AS J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1336-1347. PubMed ID: 35442526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effects of Legislation Mandating DNA Testing in Sexual Assault Cases: Results in Texas. Davis RC; Auchter B; Wells W; Camp T; Howley S Violence Against Women; 2020 Apr; 26(5):417-437. PubMed ID: 30971179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Forgotten evidence: A mixed methods study of why sexual assault kits (SAKs) are not submitted for DNA forensic testing. Campbell R; Fehler-Cabral G; Bybee D; Shaw J Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):454-467. PubMed ID: 28661168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The problem of untested sexual assault kits: why are some kits never submitted to a crime laboratory? Patterson D; Campbell R J Interpers Violence; 2012 Jul; 27(11):2259-75. PubMed ID: 22258072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A State Census of Unsubmitted Sexual Assault Kits: Comparing Forensic DNA Testing Outcomes by Geographic and Population Density Characteristics. Campbell R; Javorka M; Sharma DB; Gregory K; Opsommer M; Schelling K; Lu L J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1820-1827. PubMed ID: 32866311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tested at Last: How DNA Evidence in Untested Rape Kits Can Identify Offenders and Serial Sexual Assaults. Campbell R; Feeney H; Pierce SJ; Sharma DB; Fehler-Cabral G J Interpers Violence; 2018 Dec; 33(24):3792-3814. PubMed ID: 27021733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How to Right a Wrong: Empirically Evaluating Whether Victim, Offender, and Assault Characteristics can Inform Rape Kit Testing Policies. Goodman-Williams R; Campbell R; Sharma DB; Pierce SJ; Feeney H; Fehler-Cabral G J Trauma Dissociation; 2019; 20(3):288-303. PubMed ID: 31072268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a Victim-Centered, Trauma-Informed Victim Notification Protocol for Untested Sexual Assault Kits (SAKs). Campbell R; Shaw J; Fehler-Cabral G Violence Against Women; 2018 Mar; 24(4):379-400. PubMed ID: 29332557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Just Bring Us the Real Ones": The Role of Forensic Crime Laboratories in Guarding the Gateway to Justice for Sexual Assault Victims. Campbell R; Fehler-Cabral G J Interpers Violence; 2022 Apr; 37(7-8):NP3675-NP3702. PubMed ID: 32820970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cost-effectiveness analysis of the number of samples to collect and test from a sexual assault. Wang Z; MacMillan K; Powell M; Wein LM Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(24):13421-13427. PubMed ID: 32482858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The National Problem of Untested Sexual Assault Kits (SAKs): Scope, Causes, and Future Directions for Research, Policy, and Practice. Campbell R; Feeney H; Fehler-Cabral G; Shaw J; Horsford S Trauma Violence Abuse; 2017 Oct; 18(4):363-376. PubMed ID: 26698602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Justice Denied: Low Submission Rates of Sexual Assault Kits and the Predicting Variables. Valentine JL; Sekula LK; Cook LJ; Campbell R; Colbert A; Weedn VW J Interpers Violence; 2019 Sep; 34(17):3547-3573. PubMed ID: 29294625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changing the Criminal Justice System Response to Sexual Assault: An Empirical Study of a Participatory Action Research Project. Campbell R; Fehler-Cabral G; Pierce SJ; Sharma DB; Shaw J; Horsford S; Feeney H Am J Community Psychol; 2021 Mar; 67(1-2):166-178. PubMed ID: 32511777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical Modeling of the Case Information From the Ohio Attorney General's Sexual Assault Kit Testing Initiative. Kerka JE; Heckman DJ; Albert JH; Sprague JE; Maddox LO J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1122-1133. PubMed ID: 29193079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analyzing Approaches to the Backlog of Untested Sexual Assault Kits in the U.S.A. Wang C; Wein LM J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1110-1121. PubMed ID: 29505678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing Standard and Selective Degradation DNA Extraction Methods: Results from a Field Experiment with Sexual Assault Kits. Campbell R; Pierce SJ; Sharma DB; Shaw J; Feeney H; Nye J; Schelling K; Fehler-Cabral G J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):213-222. PubMed ID: 27885653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The case for "investigate all": Assessing the cost-effectiveness of investigating no CODIS hit cases in a sexual assault kit initiative. Lovell RE; Singer M; Flannery DJ; McGuire MJ J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1316-1328. PubMed ID: 33650102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Creating a Victim Notification Protocol for Untested Sexual Assault Kits: An Empirically Supported Planning Framework. Campbell R; Fehler-Cabral G; Horsford S J Forensic Nurs; 2017; 13(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 28212194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Victim Notification Protocols for Untested Sexual Assault Kits: Survivors' and Advocates' Perspectives on Law Enforcement-Led Outreach Methods. Campbell R; Gregory K; Goodman-Williams R; Engleton J; Javorka M Violence Against Women; 2023 Dec; 29(15-16):3101-3125. PubMed ID: 37700717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Justice Denied: A Call to Action for Forensic Nurses. Glover HA J Forensic Nurs; 2023 Apr-Jun 01; 19(2):E19-E22. PubMed ID: 37205624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]