These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35444188)

  • 1. Consumer purchase intention towards a quick response (QR) code for antibiotic information: an exploratory study.
    Bradford H; McKernan C; Elliott C; Dean M
    NPJ Sci Food; 2022 Apr; 6(1):23. PubMed ID: 35444188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consumers' perceptions and willingness to purchase pork labelled 'raised without antibiotics'.
    Bradford H; McKernan C; Elliott C; Dean M
    Appetite; 2022 Apr; 171():105900. PubMed ID: 34968563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consumers' knowledge, attitude, and behavior towards antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in food production in China.
    Ding Q; Gao J; Ding X; Huang D; Zhao Y; Yang M
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1015950. PubMed ID: 36211698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impacts of information about the risks and benefits of pork consumption on Chinese consumers' perceptions towards, and intention to eat, pork.
    Verbeke W; Liu R
    Meat Sci; 2014 Dec; 98(4):766-72. PubMed ID: 25119515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of information provision on consumers' risk perceptions of, support for a ban, and behavioral intention towards the preventive use of antibiotics in food animals.
    Zhou Y; Zhang A; van Klinken RD; Wang J
    BMC Public Health; 2024 May; 24(1):1428. PubMed ID: 38807103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consumer acceptance of a quick response (QR) code for the food traceability system: Application of an extended technology acceptance model (TAM).
    Kim YG; Woo E
    Food Res Int; 2016 Jul; 85():266-272. PubMed ID: 29544844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research on the Irrational Behavior of Consumers' Safe Consumption and Its Influencing Factors.
    Wang J; Shen M; Gao Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Dec; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 30563258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consumer perceptions of QR code technology for enhanced fluid milk shelf-life information provision in a retail setting.
    Lau S; Wiedmann M; Adalja A
    JDS Commun; 2022 Nov; 3(6):393-397. PubMed ID: 36465502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Explaining consumers' intentions towards purchasing green food in Qingdao, China: The amendment and extension of the theory of planned behavior.
    Qi X; Ploeger A
    Appetite; 2019 Feb; 133():414-422. PubMed ID: 30537527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Green-Labelled Rice versus Conventional Rice: Perception and Emotion of Chinese Consumers Based on Review Mining.
    Xu H; Xiao M; Zeng J; Hao H
    Foods; 2022 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 36613303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability.
    Xu L; Yang X; Wu L; Chen X; Chen L; Tsai FS
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31561621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The price of good welfare: Does informing consumers about what on-package labels mean for animal welfare influence their purchase intentions?
    Cornish AR; Briley D; Wilson BJ; Raubenheimer D; Schlosberg D; McGreevy PD
    Appetite; 2020 May; 148():104577. PubMed ID: 31904389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consumers' Decision-Making Process on Social Commerce Platforms: Online Trust, Perceived Risk, and Purchase Intentions.
    Lăzăroiu G; Neguriţă O; Grecu I; Grecu G; Mitran PC
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():890. PubMed ID: 32499740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What Intentions and Interesting Information Can Attract Consumers to Scan QR Code While Buying Eggs?
    Yang SH; Phan HTT; Hsieh CM; Li TN
    Foods; 2022 Apr; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 35563982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Explaining Chinese Consumers' Green Food Purchase Intentions during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour.
    Qi X; Ploeger A
    Foods; 2021 May; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 34073514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decoy Effect on Consumers' Purchase Behaviors in Relation to Meat Products: Comparison of Pork and Chicken.
    Xu L; Yu M; Chen X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():679256. PubMed ID: 34484036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consumer Preferences and Attitudes towards Antibiotic Use in Food Animals.
    Adam KE; Bruce A
    Antibiotics (Basel); 2023 Oct; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 37887246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Explaining Consumers' Intention for Traceable Pork regarding Animal Disease: The Role of Food Safety Concern, Risk Perception, Trust, and Habit.
    Dang HD; Tran GT
    Int J Food Sci; 2020; 2020():8831356. PubMed ID: 33178815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consumers' expected quality and intention to purchase high quality pork meat.
    Papanagiotou P; Tzimitra-Kalogianni I; Melfou K
    Meat Sci; 2013 Mar; 93(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 23273449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Matching Study on the Influence of Advertised Information Expression and Product Type on Consumer Purchase Intention.
    Yang Q; Liu S; Li Y; Kang H
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():859959. PubMed ID: 35432133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.