These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 354449)

  • 1. Stainless steel wire for closure of abdominal operative wounds.
    Halevy A; Oland Y; Adam YG
    Am Surg; 1978 Jun; 44(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 354449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mass closure versus layer closure of abdominal wound: a prospective clinical study.
    Chowdhury SK; Choudhury SD
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1994 Jul; 92(7):229-32. PubMed ID: 7963604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new suture for hair transplantation: poliglecaprone 25.
    Bernstein RM; Rassman WR; Rashid N
    Dermatol Surg; 2001 Jan; 27(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 11231232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negative side-effects of retention sutures for abdominal wound closure. A prospective randomised study.
    Rink AD; Goldschmidt D; Dietrich J; Nagelschmidt M; Vestweber KH
    Eur J Surg; 2000 Dec; 166(12):932-7. PubMed ID: 11152253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Burst abdomen. A preventable complication, monolayer closure of the abdominal incision with monofilament nylon.
    Mathur SK
    J Postgrad Med; 1983 Oct; 29(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 6368809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures.
    Kon ND; Meredith JW; Poole GV; Martin MB; Kawamoto E; Myers RT
    Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):549-51. PubMed ID: 6237599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abdominal wound healing: a prospective clinical study.
    Irvin TT; Stoddard CJ; Greaney MG; Duthie HL
    Br Med J; 1977 Aug; 2(6083):351-2. PubMed ID: 329940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abdominal wound disruption.
    Baggish MS; Lee WK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Nov; 46(5):530-4. PubMed ID: 1105274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mass single layer closure of abdominal wounds.
    Nayman J
    Med J Aust; 1976 Feb; 1(7):183-6. PubMed ID: 775271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Continuous single-layer anastomoses with monofilament poliglecaprone sutures in abdominal surgery.
    Samel ST; Heinrich A; Becker H; Post S
    Eur J Surg; 1999 Jul; 165(7):710-1. PubMed ID: 10452268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The figure-of-8 through-and-through monofilament abdominal wound closure with wound splints: elimination of evisceration in poor-risk wounds over 25 years.
    Dennis C; Aka E
    Surgery; 1973 Feb; 73(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 4265312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extrafascial wound dehiscence: deep en bloc closure versus superficial skin closure.
    Dodson MK; Magann EF; Sullivan DL; Meeks GR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jan; 83(1):142-5. PubMed ID: 8272296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Syneture stainless STEEL suture. A collective review of its performance in surgical wound closure.
    Edlich RF; Drake DB; Rodeheaver GT; Winters KL; Greene JA; Gubler KD; Long WB; Britt LD; Winters SP; Scott CC; Lin KY
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 16566749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary abdominal wound closure with permanent, continuous running monofilament sutures.
    Archie JP; Feldtman RW
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Nov; 153(5):721-2. PubMed ID: 7027500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective comparative clinical study between monofilament absorbable and non-absorbable sutures for abdominal wall closure.
    Gys T; Hubens A
    Acta Chir Belg; 1989; 89(5):265-70. PubMed ID: 2530745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abdominal wound dehiscence and evisceration: contributing factors and improved mortality.
    Haddad V; Macon WL
    Am Surg; 1980 Sep; 46(9):508-13. PubMed ID: 7416632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective, randomized, blinded study of a new wound closure film versus cutaneous suture for surgical wound closure.
    Kuo F; Lee D; Rogers GS
    Dermatol Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):676-81. PubMed ID: 16706763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Closure of the abdominal wall; how and why? Clinical review.
    Wadström J; Gerdin B
    Acta Chir Scand; 1990 Jan; 156(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 2181798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Burying suture knots in abdominal wound closure.
    David TE; Hermann RE
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1976 Mar; 142(3):408-9. PubMed ID: 766247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of parallel versus perpendicular placement of retention sutures in abdominal wound closure.
    Rappaport W; Allen R; Chvapil M; Benson D; Putnam C
    Am Surg; 1990 Oct; 56(10):618-23. PubMed ID: 2221612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.