BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35445297)

  • 21. Machine learning methods to support personalized neuromusculoskeletal modelling.
    Saxby DJ; Killen BA; Pizzolato C; Carty CP; Diamond LE; Modenese L; Fernandez J; Davico G; Barzan M; Lenton G; da Luz SB; Suwarganda E; Devaprakash D; Korhonen RK; Alderson JA; Besier TF; Barrett RS; Lloyd DG
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Aug; 19(4):1169-1185. PubMed ID: 32676934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Image analysis and machine learning in digital pathology: Challenges and opportunities.
    Madabhushi A; Lee G
    Med Image Anal; 2016 Oct; 33():170-175. PubMed ID: 27423409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Machine Learning in Cardiovascular Imaging.
    Kagiyama N; Tokodi M; Sengupta PP
    Heart Fail Clin; 2022 Apr; 18(2):245-258. PubMed ID: 35341538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Artificial Intelligence for Autonomous Molecular Design: A Perspective.
    Joshi RP; Kumar N
    Molecules; 2021 Nov; 26(22):. PubMed ID: 34833853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The state of art on the prediction of efficiency and modeling of the processes of pollutants removal based on machine learning.
    Taoufik N; Boumya W; Achak M; Chennouk H; Dewil R; Barka N
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 807(Pt 1):150554. PubMed ID: 34597573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Machine learning and modeling: Data, validation, communication challenges.
    El Naqa I; Ruan D; Valdes G; Dekker A; McNutt T; Ge Y; Wu QJ; Oh JH; Thor M; Smith W; Rao A; Fuller C; Xiao Y; Manion F; Schipper M; Mayo C; Moran JM; Ten Haken R
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):e834-e840. PubMed ID: 30144098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. 3D multi-physics uncertainty quantification using physics-based machine learning.
    Degen D; Cacace M; Wellmann F
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17491. PubMed ID: 36261601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Gait biomechanics in the era of data science.
    Ferber R; Osis ST; Hicks JL; Delp SL
    J Biomech; 2016 Dec; 49(16):3759-3761. PubMed ID: 27814971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Combined
    Maleckar MM; Myklebust L; Uv J; Florvaag PM; Strøm V; Glinge C; Jabbari R; Vejlstrup N; Engstrøm T; Ahtarovski K; Jespersen T; Tfelt-Hansen J; Naumova V; Arevalo H
    Front Physiol; 2021; 12():745349. PubMed ID: 34819872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Radiology: Where Do We Stand, Challenges, and Opportunities.
    Moawad AW; Fuentes DT; ElBanan MG; Shalaby AS; Guccione J; Kamel S; Jensen CT; Elsayes KM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2022 Jan-Feb 01; 46(1):78-90. PubMed ID: 35027520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Combining data assimilation and machine learning to build data-driven models for unknown long time dynamics-Applications in cardiovascular modeling.
    Regazzoni F; Chapelle D; Moireau P
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2021 Jul; 37(7):e3471. PubMed ID: 33913623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Integrating multi-fidelity blood flow data with reduced-order data assimilation.
    Habibi M; D'Souza RM; Dawson STM; Arzani A
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Aug; 135():104566. PubMed ID: 34157468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Machine learning in cardiovascular medicine: are we there yet?
    Shameer K; Johnson KW; Glicksberg BS; Dudley JT; Sengupta PP
    Heart; 2018 Jul; 104(14):1156-1164. PubMed ID: 29352006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Machine learning in cardiovascular radiology: ESCR position statement on design requirements, quality assessment, current applications, opportunities, and challenges.
    Weikert T; Francone M; Abbara S; Baessler B; Choi BW; Gutberlet M; Hecht EM; Loewe C; Mousseaux E; Natale L; Nikolaou K; Ordovas KG; Peebles C; Prieto C; Salgado R; Velthuis B; Vliegenthart R; Bremerich J; Leiner T
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jun; 31(6):3909-3922. PubMed ID: 33211147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measuring and modeling the motor system with machine learning.
    Hausmann SB; Vargas AM; Mathis A; Mathis MW
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2021 Oct; 70():11-23. PubMed ID: 34116423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perspectives on Sharing Models and Related Resources in Computational Biomechanics Research.
    Erdemir A; Hunter PJ; Holzapfel GA; Loew LM; Middleton J; Jacobs CR; Nithiarasu P; Löhner R; Wei G; Winkelstein BA; Barocas VH; Guilak F; Ku JP; Hicks JL; Delp SL; Sacks M; Weiss JA; Ateshian GA; Maas SA; McCulloch AD; Peng GCY
    J Biomech Eng; 2018 Feb; 140(2):0247011-02470111. PubMed ID: 29247253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Machine learning-accelerated computational fluid dynamics.
    Kochkov D; Smith JA; Alieva A; Wang Q; Brenner MP; Hoyer S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 May; 118(21):. PubMed ID: 34006645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiomics in gliomas: clinical implications of computational modeling and fractal-based analysis.
    Jang K; Russo C; Di Ieva A
    Neuroradiology; 2020 Jul; 62(7):771-790. PubMed ID: 32249351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Machine learning applications in spine biomechanics.
    Ghezelbash F; Hossein Eskandari A; Robert-Lachaine X; Cao S; Pesteie M; Qiao Z; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    J Biomech; 2024 Mar; 166():111967. PubMed ID: 38388222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.