163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35445298)
1. An integrated CRITIC-TOPSIS- and Entropy-TOPSIS-based informative weighting and ranking approach for evaluating green energy sources and its experimental analysis on pyrolysis.
Lakshmi BM; Mathew M; Kinol AMJ; Vedagiri B; Perumal SB; Madhu P; Dhanalakshmi CS
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(40):61370-61382. PubMed ID: 35445298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS.
Chen CH
Entropy (Basel); 2020 Feb; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 33286032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach Based on ANP-Entropy TOPSIS for Building Materials Supplier Selection.
Chen CH
Entropy (Basel); 2021 Nov; 23(12):. PubMed ID: 34945903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of consolidative multi-criteria decision making (C-MCDM) algorithms for optimal mapping of polymer materials in additive manufacturing: A case study of orthotic application.
Mian SH; Abouel Nasr E; Moiduddin K; Saleh M; Abidi MH; Alkhalefah H
Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e30867. PubMed ID: 38770323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pyrolysis and copyrolysis of three lignocellulosic biomass residues from the agro-food industry: A comparative study.
Fermanelli CS; Córdoba A; Pierella LB; Saux C
Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 102():362-370. PubMed ID: 31731255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pyrolysis of agricultural biomass residues: Comparative study of corn cob, wheat straw, rice straw and rice husk.
Biswas B; Pandey N; Bisht Y; Singh R; Kumar J; Bhaskar T
Bioresour Technol; 2017 Aug; 237():57-63. PubMed ID: 28238637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human risk assessment of Panchet Dam in India using TOPSIS and WASPAS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods.
Bid S; Siddique G
Heliyon; 2019 Jun; 5(6):e01956. PubMed ID: 31294108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach to analyze wastewater microalgae culture systems for bioenergy production.
Liu W; Liu A; Qin H; Yan Y; Fu D; Singh RP
Environ Res; 2024 Sep; 256():119234. PubMed ID: 38802031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of Cd on Pyrolysis Velocity and Deoxygenation Characteristics of Rice Straw: Analogized with Cd-Impregnated Representative Biomass Components.
Xu Z; Guo Z; Xie H; Hu Y
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 35897323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of pretreatment and biomass blending on bio-oil and biochar quality from two-step slow pyrolysis of rice straw.
Bhatnagar A; Singhal A; Tolvanen H; Valtonen K; Joronen T; Konttinen J
Waste Manag; 2022 Feb; 138():298-307. PubMed ID: 34922304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal evaluation of crop residues for gasification in Ghana using integrated multi-criterial decision making techniques.
Osei I; Addo A; Kemausuor F
Heliyon; 2023 Oct; 9(10):e20553. PubMed ID: 37822638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ranking provincial power generation sources of China: a decision-maker preferences based integrated multi-criteria framework.
Yu S; Zheng Y; Li L; Wang K
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Oct; 27(29):36391-36410. PubMed ID: 32562228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A green route for pyrolysis poly-generation of typical high ash biomass, rice husk: Effects on simultaneous production of carbonic oxide-rich syngas, phenol-abundant bio-oil, high-adsorption porous carbon and amorphous silicon dioxide.
Su Y; Liu L; Zhang S; Xu D; Du H; Cheng Y; Wang Z; Xiong Y
Bioresour Technol; 2020 Jan; 295():122243. PubMed ID: 31622918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing microbial strain selection for pyrethroid biodegradation in contaminated environments through a TOPSIS-based decision-making system.
Gangola S; Chaube S; Bayram A; Joshi S; Bhandari G; Malik S; Khan AA
Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14928. PubMed ID: 38942772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach to select appropriate biomass resources for biofuel production.
Firouzi S; Allahyari MS; Isazadeh M; Nikkhah A; Van Haute S
Sci Total Environ; 2021 May; 770():144449. PubMed ID: 33513499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Land evaluation approaches comparing TOPSIS and SAW with parametric methods for rice cultivation.
Azadi A; Jalali AS; Navidi MN
Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Oct; 195(11):1296. PubMed ID: 37821796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomass co-pyrolysis: Effects of blending three different biomasses on oil yield and quality.
Hopa DY; Alagöz O; Yılmaz N; Dilek M; Arabacı G; Mutlu T
Waste Manag Res; 2019 Sep; 37(9):925-933. PubMed ID: 31319779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of the relevance between biomass pyrolysis polygeneration and washing pretreatment under different severities: Water, dilute acid solution and aqueous phase bio-oil.
Cen K; Zhang J; Ma Z; Chen D; Zhou J; Ma H
Bioresour Technol; 2019 Apr; 278():26-33. PubMed ID: 30669028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel drug selection decision support model based on real-world medical data by the hybrid entropic weight TOPSIS method.
Lu J; Wang G; Ying X; Li Z
Technol Health Care; 2023; 31(2):691-703. PubMed ID: 36278366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Natural gas based on combined fuzzy TOPSIS technique and entropy.
Fahmi A; Khan A; Thabet Abdeljawad ; Alqudah MA
Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(1):e23391. PubMed ID: 38192751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
