These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35445834)

  • 1. Healthcare Resource Utilization After Surgical Treatment of Cancer: Value of Minimally Invasive Surgery.
    Ricciardi R; Goldstone RN; Francone T; Wszolek M; Auchincloss H; de Groot A; Shih IF; Li Y
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7549-7560. PubMed ID: 35445834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Readmissions After Lobectomy in an Era of Increasing Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Statewide Analysis.
    Hendriksen BS; Reed MF; Taylor MD; Hollenbeak CS
    Innovations (Phila); 2019 Oct; 14(5):453-462. PubMed ID: 31533516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of health-care utilization and expenditures for minimally invasive vs. open colectomy for benign disease.
    Diaz SE; Lee YF; Bastawrous AL; Shih IF; Lee SH; Li Y; Cleary RK
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7250-7258. PubMed ID: 35194661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United States.
    Alwatari Y; Khoraki J; Wolfe LG; Ramamoorthy B; Wall N; Liu C; Julliard W; Puig CA; Shah RD
    JTCVS Open; 2022 Dec; 12():385-398. PubMed ID: 36590738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients.
    Hopkins MB; Geiger TM; Bethurum AJ; Ford MM; Muldoon RL; Beck DE; Stewart TG; Hawkins AT
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2613-2622. PubMed ID: 31346754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit Data.
    Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Kroon HM; Moore JW; Hunter RA; Sammour T
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jun; 63(6):778-787. PubMed ID: 32109916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
    Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive and open radical resection for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes in elderly/frail patients.
    Li R; Zhou J; Zhao S; Sun L; Fu Y; Zhang C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 38466495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of minimally invasive surgery on short-term outcomes after rectal resection for neoplasm within the setting of an enhanced recovery program.
    Martin AN; Berry PS; Friel CM; Hedrick TL
    Surg Endosc; 2018 May; 32(5):2517-2524. PubMed ID: 29101566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Hyde LZ; Baser O; Mehendale S; Guo D; Shah M; Kiran RP
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Aug; 21(8):932-942. PubMed ID: 31062521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic, Open, and Robotic Approaches for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.
    Kethman WC; Harris AHS; Morris AM; Shelton A; Kirilcuk N; Kin C
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jan; 63(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 31764247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive versus open multivisceral resection for rectal cancer clinically invading adjacent organs: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Abe S; Nozawa H; Sasaki K; Murono K; Emoto S; Yokoyama Y; Matsuzaki H; Nagai Y; Shinagawa T; Sonoda H; Ishihara S
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3263-3272. PubMed ID: 38658387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of type of minimally invasive approach on open conversions across ten common procedures in different specialties.
    Shah PC; de Groot A; Cerfolio R; Huang WC; Huang K; Song C; Li Y; Kreaden U; Oh DS
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):6067-6075. PubMed ID: 35141775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA).
    van Harten MJ; Greenwood EB; Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Hunter RA; Kroon HM; Sammour T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 32312590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utilization Trends, Outcomes, and Cost in Minimally Invasive Lobectomy.
    Subramanian MP; Liu J; Chapman WC; Olsen MA; Yan Y; Liu Y; Semenkovich TR; Meyers BF; Puri V; Kozower BD
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Dec; 108(6):1648-1655. PubMed ID: 31400324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
    Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Post-operative outcomes in patients with locally advanced colon cancer: a comparison of operative approach.
    Guidolin K; Ng D; Chadi S; Quereshy FA
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):4580-4587. PubMed ID: 34988743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hospital cost and clinical effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic and open lobectomy: A propensity score-weighted comparison.
    Kneuertz PJ; Singer E; D'Souza DM; Abdel-Rasoul M; Moffatt-Bruce SD; Merritt RE
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 May; 157(5):2018-2026.e2. PubMed ID: 30819575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes After Robotic Lobectomy for Early-stage Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer Versus Video-assisted Thoracoscopic and Open Thoracotomy Approach.
    Kneuertz PJ; D'Souza DM; Richardson M; Abdel-Rasoul M; Moffatt-Bruce SD; Merritt RE
    Clin Lung Cancer; 2020 May; 21(3):214-224.e2. PubMed ID: 31685354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic and open surgery for patients undergoing rectal cancer resection with concurrent stoma creation.
    Goldstone RN; Francone T; Milky G; Shih IF; Bossie H; Li Y; Ricciardi R
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Aug; 38(8):4550-4558. PubMed ID: 38942946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.