These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35446098)
1. When meta-analysis continues to mislead: A reply to Østergård and Hougaard (2020). Duncan BL; Sparks JA Psychol Serv; 2023; 20(Suppl 2):238-240. PubMed ID: 35446098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The evidence for the partners for change outcome management system is insufficient: Reply to Duncan and Sparks (2020). Østergård OK; Hougaard E Psychol Serv; 2020 Nov; 17(4):497-498. PubMed ID: 33211514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When meta-analysis misleads: A critical case study of a meta-analysis of client feedback. Duncan BL; Sparks JA Psychol Serv; 2020 Nov; 17(4):487-496. PubMed ID: 31670540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A dismantling study of the Partners for Change Outcome Management System. Mikeal CW; Gillaspy JA; Scoles MT; Murphy JJ J Couns Psychol; 2016 Nov; 63(6):704-709. PubMed ID: 27513088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feedback-informed treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the partners for change outcome management system. Pejtersen JH; Viinholt BCA; Hansen H J Couns Psychol; 2020 Nov; 67(6):723-735. PubMed ID: 32212760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of using the Partners for Change Outcome Management System as feedback tool in psychotherapy-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Østergård OK; Randa H; Hougaard E Psychother Res; 2020 Feb; 30(2):195-212. PubMed ID: 30213240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of implementing the partners for change outcome management system in a nationwide student counseling service. Østergård OK; O'Toole MS; Svendsen MM; Hougaard E J Couns Psychol; 2020 Jan; 67(1):90-103. PubMed ID: 31144845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The "space" of history: A response to Graiver (2020), Rossano (2020), and Smail (2020). Henley TB Hist Psychol; 2020 Aug; 23(3):230-231. PubMed ID: 32940505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do routine outcome monitoring measures tell the same story? Evaluating outcome trajectories and clinical outcomes for the outcome rating scale and outcome questionnaire - 45. Redmayne KA; Reese RJ; Zetzer HA; Conoley CW; Owen J Psychother Res; 2024 Feb; 34(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 36931233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning. Bøg M; Filges T; Jørgensen AMK Campbell Syst Rev; 2018; 14(1):1-127. PubMed ID: 37131363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does a continuous feedback system improve psychotherapy outcome? Reese RJ; Norsworthy LA; Rowlands SR Psychotherapy (Chic); 2009 Dec; 46(4):418-31. PubMed ID: 22121836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Leaviss J; Davis S; Ren S; Hamilton J; Scope A; Booth A; Sutton A; Parry G; Buszewicz M; Moss-Morris R; White P Health Technol Assess; 2020 Sep; 24(46):1-490. PubMed ID: 32975190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does forcing reduce faking? A meta-analytic review of forced-choice personality measures in high-stakes situations. Cao M; Drasgow F J Appl Psychol; 2019 Nov; 104(11):1347-1368. PubMed ID: 31070382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults. Kendrick T; El-Gohary M; Stuart B; Gilbody S; Churchill R; Aiken L; Bhattacharya A; Gimson A; Brütt AL; de Jong K; Moore M Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jul; 7(7):CD011119. PubMed ID: 27409972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Capture, transfer, and feedback of patient-centered outcomes data in palliative care populations: does it make a difference? A systematic review. Etkind SN; Daveson BA; Kwok W; Witt J; Bausewein C; Higginson IJ; Murtagh FE J Pain Symptom Manage; 2015 Mar; 49(3):611-24. PubMed ID: 25135657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Partners for Change Outcome Management System (PCOMS) revisiting the client's frame of reference. Duncan BL; Reese RJ Psychotherapy (Chic); 2015 Dec; 52(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 26641369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In the eye of the beholder: Considering culture in assessing the social desirability of personality. Ryan AM; Bradburn J; Bhatia S; Beals E; Boyce AS; Martin N; Conway J J Appl Psychol; 2021 Mar; 106(3):452-466. PubMed ID: 32463259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic client feedback to brief therapy in basic mental healthcare: study protocol for a four-centre clinical trial. Bovendeerd B; de Jong K; Colijn S; de Groot E; Hafkenscheid A; Moerbeek M; de Keijser J BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e025701. PubMed ID: 31092647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Authentic/hubristic pride controversies as a window on broader emotion measurement issues: Reply to Tracy et al. (2023). Murphy BA; Dickens LR Emotion; 2023 Apr; 23(3):899-902. PubMed ID: 37079836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]