187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35446188)
1. Comparison of Endoscopically Assisted Primary Probing and Bicanalicular Silicone Intubation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children Aged 4 to 7 Years.
Arici C; Mergen B; Ozan T; Batu Oto B
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2023; 60(2):101-107. PubMed ID: 35446188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nasal endoscopy-guided primary nasolacrimal duct intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 4 years.
Arici C; Oto BB
Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Mar; 43(3):1005-1011. PubMed ID: 36053476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective, randomised comparison of probing versus bicanalicular silastic intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Al-Faky YH; Mousa A; Kalantan H; Al-Otaibi A; Alodan H; Alsuhaibani AH
Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 99(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 25185252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the success rate between monocanalicular and bicanalicular intubations in incomplete complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Eshraghi B; Jamshidian-Tehrani M; Mirmohammadsadeghi A
Orbit; 2017 Aug; 36(4):215-217. PubMed ID: 28627964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparing of Treatment Results of Monocanalicular and Bicanalicular Intubation in Inborn Lacrimal Duct Obstruction].
Červenka S; Matoušek P; Komínek P
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2016; 72(5):178-181. PubMed ID: 28224803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction update study (CUP study): Paper II - Profile and outcomes of complex CNLDO and masquerades.
Bansal O; Bothra N; Sharma A; Ali MJ
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 139():110407. PubMed ID: 33068946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Treatment of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children: A Retrospective Review.
Eustis HS; Nguyen AH
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2018 Jan; 55(1):65-67. PubMed ID: 28991351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monocanalicular silastic intubation for the initial correction of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Engel JM; Hichie-Schmidt C; Khammar A; Ostfeld BM; Vyas A; Ticho BH
J AAPOS; 2007 Apr; 11(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 17307001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Novel One-Stage Obstruction-Based Endoscopic Approach to Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.
Kashkouli MB; Abtahi MB; Sianati H; Mahvidizadeh N; Pakdel F; Kashkouli PB; Abdolalizadeh P
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017; 33(5):350-354. PubMed ID: 27636242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the success rates of endoscopic-assisted probing in the treatment of membranous congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction between younger and older children and its correlation with the thickness of the membrane at the Valve of Hasner.
Gupta N; Neeraj C; Smriti B; Sima D
Orbit; 2018 Aug; 37(4):257-261. PubMed ID: 29040026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing for the treatment of simple and incomplete complex types of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 18 months old.
Eshraghi B; Khalilipour E; Ameli K; Bazvand F; Mirmohammadsadeghi A
Orbit; 2017 Aug; 36(4):218-222. PubMed ID: 28627958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Success Rates of Conventional Versus Endoscope-Assisted Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children 12 Years and Younger.
Galindo-Ferreiro A; Akaishi P; Cruz A; Khandekar R; Dossari S; Dufaileej M; Galvez-Ruiz A; Schellini S
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2016 Sep; 53(5):292-9. PubMed ID: 27383144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High incidence and recurrence of tympanostomy tube procedures in children who underwent nasolacrimal duct probe and intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Vicinanzo MG; Cooper KM; Gerber AL; Long J; McGwin G
J AAPOS; 2023 Oct; 27(5):286.e1-286.e4. PubMed ID: 37734706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nasal endoscopic features and outcomes of nasal endoscopy guided bicanalicular intubation for complex persistent congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions.
Singh M; Sharma M; Kaur M; Grewal AM; Yadav D; Handa S; Yangzes S; Zadeng Z; Gupta P
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 67(7):1137-1142. PubMed ID: 31238429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transcanalicular endoscopic primary dacryoplasty for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Matsumura N; Suzuki T; Goto S; Fujita T; Yamane S; Maruyama-Inoue M; Kadonosono K
Eye (Lond); 2019 Jun; 33(6):1008-1013. PubMed ID: 30783256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Congenital nasolacrymal duct obstruction: pulled monocanalicular intubation (Monoka) versus pushed monocanalicular intubation (Masterka)].
Vernat-Tabarly O; Delmas J; Robert PY
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2020 Jun; 43(6):461-466. PubMed ID: 32360081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of Probing in Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children Older Than 2 Years.
Une VL; Kulkarni SS; Nandedkar VS
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2019 May; 56(3):141-145. PubMed ID: 31116859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The prevalence of amblyogenic factors in children with persistent congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Eshraghi B; Akbari MR; Fard MA; Shahsanaei A; Assari R; Mirmohammadsadeghi A
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 252(11):1847-52. PubMed ID: 24777709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Andalib D; Gharabaghi D; Nabai R; Abbaszadeh M
J AAPOS; 2010 Oct; 14(5):421-4. PubMed ID: 21035069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retrospective analysis of silicon intubation by Ritleng probe and Sutupak suture fixed in silicone tube in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Killedar M; Sasurkar P; Gokhale N; Shah M; Visapure R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2021 Aug; 69(8):2095-2098. PubMed ID: 34304185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
