These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35446218)
1. Computational Fontan Analysis: Preserving Accuracy While Expediting Workflow. Liu X; Aslan S; Kim B; Warburton L; Jackson D; Muhuri A; Subramanian A; Mass P; Cleveland V; Loke YH; Hibino N; Olivieri L; Krieger A World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg; 2022 May; 13(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 35446218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Virtual surgical planning, flow simulation, and 3-dimensional electrospinning of patient-specific grafts to optimize Fontan hemodynamics. Siallagan D; Loke YH; Olivieri L; Opfermann J; Ong CS; de Zélicourt D; Petrou A; Daners MS; Kurtcuoglu V; Meboldt M; Nelson K; Vricella L; Johnson J; Hibino N; Krieger A J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Apr; 155(4):1734-1742. PubMed ID: 29361303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can time-averaged flow boundary conditions be used to meet the clinical timeline for Fontan surgical planning? Wei ZA; Trusty PM; Tree M; Haggerty CM; Tang E; Fogel M; Yoganathan AP J Biomech; 2017 Jan; 50():172-179. PubMed ID: 27855985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of respiration-driven flow waveforms on hemodynamic metrics used in Fontan surgical planning. Tang E; Wei ZA; Trusty PM; Whitehead KK; Mirabella L; Veneziani A; Fogel MA; Yoganathan AP J Biomech; 2019 Jan; 82():87-95. PubMed ID: 30414631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of surgeon intuition and computer-aided design in Fontan optimization: A computational fluid dynamics simulation study. Loke YH; Kim B; Mass P; Opfermann JD; Hibino N; Krieger A; Olivieri L J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Jul; 160(1):203-212.e2. PubMed ID: 32057454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro measurement of hepatic flow distribution in Fontan vascular conduits: Towards rapid validation techniques. Rasooli R; Kose B; Samaneh Lashkarinia S; Sasmazel A; Pekkan K J Biomech; 2022 May; 137():111092. PubMed ID: 35460935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting Hemodynamic Performance of Fontan Operation for Glenn Physiology using Computational Fluid Dynamics: Ten Patient-specific Cases. Javadi E; Laudenschlager S; Kheyfets V; Di Maria M; Stone M; Jamali S; Powell AJ; Moghari MH J Clin Images Med Case Rep; 2022 Jun; 3(6):. PubMed ID: 36339935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical planning of the total cavopulmonary connection: robustness analysis. Restrepo M; Luffel M; Sebring J; Kanter K; Del Nido P; Veneziani A; Rossignac J; Yoganathan A Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Jun; 43(6):1321-34. PubMed ID: 25316591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Age-related change in Caval Flow Ratio on Hepatic Flow Distribution in Fontan. Govindarajan V; Marshall L; Sahni A; Cetatoiu M; Eickhoff E; Davee J; St Clair N; Schulz N; Hoganson DM; Hammer PE; Ghelani S; Prakash A; Del Nido PJ; Rathod RH medRxiv; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37732201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Progress in the CFD modeling of flow instabilities in anatomical total cavopulmonary connections. Wang C; Pekkan K; de Zélicourt D; Horner M; Parihar A; Kulkarni A; Yoganathan AP Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Nov; 35(11):1840-56. PubMed ID: 17641974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postsurgical comparison of pulsatile hemodynamics in five unique total cavopulmonary connections: identifying ideal connection strategies. Hong H; Menon PG; Zhang H; Ye L; Zhu Z; Chen H; Liu J Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Oct; 96(4):1398-1404. PubMed ID: 23910632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computational Fluid Dynamics Support for Fontan Planning in Minutes, Not Hours: The Next Step in Clinical Pre-Interventional Simulations. Frieberg P; Aristokleous N; Sjöberg P; Töger J; Liuba P; Carlsson M J Cardiovasc Transl Res; 2022 Aug; 15(4):708-720. PubMed ID: 34961904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]