These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35446221)

  • 1. Compression Device-Assisted Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Cannulation in Pediatric Patients-A Simulation Study.
    Peer SM; Bukhari S; Desai M; Tongut A; Ho A; Yerebakan C; Ramakrishnan K; Sinha P; Jonas RA; Yurasek G; Cleary K
    World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg; 2022 May; 13(3):379-382. PubMed ID: 35446221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest.
    Wang PL; Brooks SC
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD007260. PubMed ID: 30125048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does a more "physiological" infant manikin design effect chest compression quality and create a potential for thoracic over-compression during simulated infant CPR?
    Martin PS; Kemp AM; Theobald PS; Maguire SA; Jones MD
    Resuscitation; 2013 May; 84(5):666-71. PubMed ID: 23123431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal chest compression for cardiac arrest until the establishment of ECPR: Secondary analysis of the SAVE-J II study.
    Nagashima F; Inoue S; Oda T; Hamagami T; Matsuda T; Kobayashi M; Inoue A; Hifumi T; Sakamoto T; Kuroda Y;
    Am J Emerg Med; 2024 Apr; 78():102-111. PubMed ID: 38244243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of one-rescuer compression/ventilation ratios on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infant, pediatric, and adult manikins.
    Srikantan SK; Berg RA; Cox T; Tice L; Nadkarni VM
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2005 May; 6(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 15857527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rescue under ongoing CPR from an upper floor: evaluation of three different evacuation routes and mechanical and manual chest compressions: a manikin trial.
    Drinhaus H; Nüsgen S; Adams N; Wetsch WA; Annecke T
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2020 Mar; 28(1):16. PubMed ID: 32131894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simulation intervention with manikin-based objective metrics improves CPR instructor chest compression performance skills without improvement in chest compression assessment skills.
    Al-Rasheed RS; Devine J; Dunbar-Viveiros JA; Jones MS; Dannecker M; Machan JT; Jay GD; Kobayashi L
    Simul Healthc; 2013 Aug; 8(4):242-52. PubMed ID: 23842118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Chest Compressions Metrics Measured Using the Laerdal Skill Reporter and Q-CPR: A Simulation Study.
    Davey P; Whatman C; Dicker B
    Simul Healthc; 2015 Oct; 10(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 26426556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of chest compression feedback during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in lateral tilted and semirecumbent positions: a randomised controlled simulation study.
    Song Y; Oh J; Chee Y; Cho Y; Lee S; Lim TH
    Anaesthesia; 2015 Nov; 70(11):1235-41. PubMed ID: 26349025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impacts of a Pediatric Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) Simulation Training Program.
    Sawyer T; Burke C; McMullan DM; Chan T; Valdivia H; Yalon L; Roberts J
    Acad Pediatr; 2019 Jul; 19(5):566-571. PubMed ID: 30684655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High Variability in the Duration of Chest Compression Interruption is Associated With Poor Outcomes in Pediatric Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
    Han P; Rasmussen L; Su F; Dacre M; Knight L; Berg M; Tawfik D; Haileselassie B
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2024 May; 25(5):452-460. PubMed ID: 38299932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Poor chest compression quality with mechanical compressions in simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized, cross-over manikin study.
    Blomberg H; Gedeborg R; Berglund L; Karlsten R; Johansson J
    Resuscitation; 2011 Oct; 82(10):1332-7. PubMed ID: 21724317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality Comparison of the Manual Chest Compression and the Mechanical Chest Compression During Difficult Transport Conditions.
    Bekgöz B; Şan İ; Ergin M
    J Emerg Med; 2020 Mar; 58(3):432-438. PubMed ID: 32229137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue-a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study.
    Putzer G; Braun P; Zimmermann A; Pedross F; Strapazzon G; Brugger H; Paal P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 31(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 23000324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CPR PRO® device reduces rescuer fatigue during continuous chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover trial using a manikin model.
    Kovic I; Lulic D; Lulic I
    J Emerg Med; 2013 Oct; 45(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 23845522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RESCUE transesophageal echocardiography for monitoring of mechanical chest compressions and guidance for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation cannulation in refractory cardiac arrest.
    Giorgetti R; Chiricolo G; Melniker L; Calaf C; Gaeta T
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2020 Mar; 48(3):184-187. PubMed ID: 31820822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Realistic, Low-Cost Simulated Automated Chest Compression Device.
    Joyce J; Fults E; Rajan J; Plezia A; Clayton C; Hock SM
    J Educ Teach Emerg Med; 2024 Apr; 9(2):I7-I15. PubMed ID: 38707939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved chest recoil using an adhesive glove device for active compression-decompression CPR in a pediatric manikin model.
    Udassi JP; Udassi S; Lamb MA; Lamb KE; Theriaque DW; Shuster JJ; Zaritsky AL; Haque IU
    Resuscitation; 2009 Oct; 80(10):1158-63. PubMed ID: 19683849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mountain rescue cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a comparison between manual and mechanical chest compressions during manikin cardio resuscitation.
    Thomassen O; Skaiaa SC; Assmuss J; Østerås Ø; Heltne JK; Wik L; Brattebo G
    Emerg Med J; 2017 Sep; 34(9):573-577. PubMed ID: 28476730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Manual versus Mechanical Chest Compressions on Surfaces of Varying Softness with or without Backboards: A Randomized, Crossover Manikin Study.
    Putzer G; Fiala A; Braun P; Neururer S; Biechl K; Keilig B; Ploner W; Fop E; Paal P
    J Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 50(4):594-600.e1. PubMed ID: 26607696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.