These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 354463)

  • 1. Early visual rehabilitation after keratoplasty: a double running suture technique.
    McNeill JI; Kaufman HE
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1978 Apr; 10(5):652-5. PubMed ID: 354463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Shortterm and longterm visual and astigmatic results of an opposing 10-0 nylon double running suture technique for penetrating keratoplasty.
    Dolorico AM; Tayyani R; Ong HV; Gaster RN
    J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Dec; 197(6):991-9. PubMed ID: 14644288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Results of a double running suture in penetrating keratoplasty performed on keratoconus patients.
    Young SR; Olson RJ
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1985 Dec; 16(12):779-86. PubMed ID: 3911128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of suturing techniques in keratoplasty for keratoconus.
    Boruchoff SA; Jensen AD; Dohlman CH
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1975 Mar; 7(3):433-6. PubMed ID: 1094893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complications associated with running 11-0 nylon suture in penetrating keratoplasty.
    Olson RJ
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1982 Jul; 13(7):558-61. PubMed ID: 7050808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of two selective interrupted suture removal techniques for control of post keratoplasty astigmatism.
    Forster RK
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1997; 95():193-214; discussion 214-20. PubMed ID: 9440170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current techniques for improved visual results after penetrating keratoplasty.
    Bourne WM
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1981 May; 12(5):321-7. PubMed ID: 7022297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Results of penetrating keratoplasty using a double running suture technique.
    Davison JA; Bourne WM
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 Sep; 99(9):1591-5. PubMed ID: 7025812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Topographic changes that occur with 10-0 running suture removal following penetrating keratoplasty.
    Lin DT; Wilson SE; Reidy JJ; Klyce SD; McDonald MB; Insler MS; Kaufman HE
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1990; 6(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 2248900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corneal topography-guided penetrating keratoplasty and suture adjustment: new approach for astigmatism control.
    Vinciguerra P; Epstein D; Albè E; Spada F; Incarnato N; Orzalesi N; Rosetta P
    Cornea; 2007 Jul; 26(6):675-82. PubMed ID: 17592315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Different suturing techniques variously affect the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism.
    Busin M; Mönks T; al-Nawaiseh I
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Jul; 105(7):1200-5. PubMed ID: 9663222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Reduction of astigmatism after perforating keratoplasty by adjustment of single running sutures and its influence on visual acuity].
    Pesko K; Kozlíková K; Oláh Z
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2004 Jul; 60(4):275-83. PubMed ID: 15369264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complications of Mersilene sutures in penetrating keratoplasty.
    Bertram BA; Drews-Botsch C; Gemmill M; Guell J; Murad M; Waring GO
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1992; 8(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 1390410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual outcome after allogenic penetrating keratoplasty.
    Jonas JB; Rank RM; Budde WM
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Apr; 240(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 11981645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deep lamellar keratoplasty by intracorneal dissection: a prospective clinical and confocal microscopic study.
    Marchini G; Mastropasqua L; Pedrotti E; Nubile M; Ciancaglini M; Sbabo A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Aug; 113(8):1289-300. PubMed ID: 16877068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Zernike representation of corneal topography height data after nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty.
    Langenbucher A; Seitz B; Kus MM; Naumann GO
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):582-91. PubMed ID: 10067961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Keratometric results during the first year after keratoplasty: adjustable single running suture technique versus double running suture technique.
    Ramirez M; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 2001; 32(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 11563780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No-suture aphakic epikeratoplasty.
    Cotter JB
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1992; 8(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 1554636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Change in refraction and topography after penetrating keratoplasty suture removal].
    Touzeau O; Scheer S; Borderie V; Allouch C; Bourcier T; Moldovan M; Laroche L
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2001 Sep; 24(7):692-703. PubMed ID: 11591908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term results of penetrating keratoplasty using a single or double running suture technique.
    Spadea L; Cifariello F; Bianco G; Balestrazzi E
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 May; 240(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 12073066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.