These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3544663)

  • 1. Follow up of babies delivered in a randomized controlled comparison of vacuum extraction and forceps delivery.
    Carmody F; Grant A; Mutch L; Vacca A; Chalmers I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1986; 65(7):763-6. PubMed ID: 3544663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in instrumental deliveries with the Kobayashi vacuum extractor and low forceps.
    Meyer L; Mailloux J; Marcoux S; Blanchet P; Meyer F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1987; 66(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 3439447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Sequelae for the infants of vacuum extraction operations with the subsequent application of obstetrical forceps].
    Holota VIa; Sonnyk HT; Odarenko IM
    Pediatr Akus Ginekol; 1979; (3):57-9. PubMed ID: 461009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forceps or vacuum extraction? A comparison of effects on the newborn infant.
    Fall O; Rydén G; Finnström K; Finnström O; Leijon I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1986; 65(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 3716785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vacuum extraction and forceps delivery in a district hospital.
    Carter J; Gudgeon CW
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1987 May; 27(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 3499889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neonatal and maternal complications among pregnant women delivered by vacuum extraction or forceps extraction.
    Kovavisarach E; Varanuntakul T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1999 Apr; 82(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 10410490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomised prospective study comparing the new vacuum extractor policy with forceps delivery.
    Johanson RB; Rice C; Doyle M; Arthur J; Anyanwu L; Ibrahim J; Warwick A; Redman CW; O'Brien PM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Jun; 100(6):524-30. PubMed ID: 8334086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft cup vacuum extraction: a comparison of outlet delivery.
    Dell DL; Sightler SE; Plauché WC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 4058820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Portsmouth operative delivery trial: a comparison vacuum extraction and forceps delivery.
    Vacca A; Grant A; Wyatt G; Chalmers I
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Dec; 90(12):1107-12. PubMed ID: 6652049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of the condition of newborn infants delivered by obstetrical forceps and vacuum extraction].
    Gajewska E; Wachnik D; Orlik-Adamska S
    Ginekol Pol; 1985 Feb; 56(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 4043787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of instrumental delivery on the frequency and severity of retinal hemorrhages in the newborn.
    Egge K; Lyng G; Maltau JM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1981; 60(2):153-5. PubMed ID: 7246079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow up of a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse.
    Johanson RB; Heycock E; Carter J; Sultan AH; Walklate K; Jones PW
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Jun; 106(6):544-9. PubMed ID: 10426611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Connexions between instrumental delivery and cerebral damage in the infant (author's transl)].
    Naske R; Poustka F; Presslich O; Schubert H; Zapotoczky HG; Altmann P; Schaller A
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1976 May; 88(10):319-24. PubMed ID: 997523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maternal and child health after assisted vaginal delivery: five-year follow up of a randomised controlled study comparing forceps and ventouse.
    Johanson RB; Heycock E; Carter J; Sultan AH; Walklate K; Jones PW
    BJOG; 2014 Dec; 121 Suppl 7():23-8. PubMed ID: 25488084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative safety of vacuum extraction vs Kielland forceps delivery.
    Driscoll IB
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2000 May; 40(2):226. PubMed ID: 10925919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.