223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35449382)
1. Effects of hydrophilic coated catheters on urethral trauma, microtrauma and adverse events with intermittent catheterization in patients with bladder dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liao X; Liu Y; Liang S; Li K
Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Jul; 54(7):1461-1470. PubMed ID: 35449382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic catheters for clean intermittent catheterization: a meta-analysis to determine their capacity in reducing urinary tract infections.
Plata M; Santander J; Zuluaga L; Torres-Sandoval C; Valencia S; Azuero J; Trujillo CG
World J Urol; 2023 Feb; 41(2):491-499. PubMed ID: 36547679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analyses.
Rognoni C; Tarricone R
BMC Urol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):4. PubMed ID: 28073354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intermittent Catheters for Chronic Urinary Retention: A Health Technology Assessment.
Health Quality Ontario
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2019; 19(1):1-153. PubMed ID: 30847008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hydrophilic catheters for intermittent catheterization and occurrence of urinary tract infections. A retrospective comparative study in patients with spinal cord Injury.
Ali S; Khan OS; Youssef AM; Saba I; Alfedaih D
BMC Urol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):122. PubMed ID: 38867233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated catheter versus conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization.
Vapnek JM; Maynard FM; Kim J
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):994-8. PubMed ID: 12576829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Determining the noninfectious complications of indwelling urethral catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hollingsworth JM; Rogers MA; Krein SL; Hickner A; Kuhn L; Cheng A; Chang R; Saint S
Ann Intern Med; 2013 Sep; 159(6):401-10. PubMed ID: 24042368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes comparison of hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic catheters for patients with intermittent catheterization: An updated meta-analysis.
Feng D; Cheng L; Bai Y; Yang Y; Han P
Asian J Surg; 2020 May; 43(5):633-635. PubMed ID: 31959575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis.
Bermingham SL; Hodgkinson S; Wright S; Hayter E; Spinks J; Pellowe C
BMJ; 2013 Jan; 346():e8639. PubMed ID: 23303886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Healthcare resource consumption for intermittent urinary catheterisation: cost-effectiveness of hydrophilic catheters and budget impact analyses.
Rognoni C; Tarricone R
BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e012360. PubMed ID: 28096251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Types of indwelling urethral catheters for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults.
Lam TB; Omar MI; Fisher E; Gillies K; MacLennan S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; (9):CD004013. PubMed ID: 25248140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of hydrophilic catheters on urinary tract infections in people with spinal cord injury: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Li L; Ye W; Ruan H; Yang B; Zhang S; Li L
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Apr; 94(4):782-7. PubMed ID: 23168400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-intermittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: a systematic review.
Shamout S; Biardeau X; Corcos J; Campeau L
Spinal Cord; 2017 Jul; 55(7):629-643. PubMed ID: 28117329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hydrophilic catheters: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(9):1-31. PubMed ID: 23074500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized Crossover Trial of Single Use Hydrophilic Coated vs Multiple Use Polyvinylchloride Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization to Determine Incidence of Urinary Infection.
Kiddoo D; Sawatzky B; Bascu CD; Dharamsi N; Afshar K; Moore KN
J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 25584995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults.
Kidd EA; Stewart F; Kassis NC; Hom E; Omar MI
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Dec; 2015(12):CD004203. PubMed ID: 26661940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The incidence of urinary tract infection of different routes of catheterization following gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Li M; Yao L; Han C; Li H; Xun Y; Yan P; Wang M; He W; Lu C; Yang K
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):523-535. PubMed ID: 30374534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can hydrophilic coated catheters be beneficial for the public healthcare system in Brazil? - A cost-effectiveness analysis in patients with spinal cord injuries.
Truzzi JC; Teich V; Pepe C
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(1):121-131. PubMed ID: 28792195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic-coated catheters (SpeediCath) reduces the risk of clinical urinary tract infection in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomised parallel comparative trial.
De Ridder DJ; Everaert K; Fernández LG; Valero JV; Durán AB; Abrisqueta ML; Ventura MG; Sotillo AR
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):991-5. PubMed ID: 16137822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalised adults.
Brosnahan J; Jull A; Tracy C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (1):CD004013. PubMed ID: 14974052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
