232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35450702)
1. Influence of thermal and thermomechanical stimuli on a molar tooth treated with resin-based restorative dental composites.
Thadathil Varghese J; Babaei B; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty BG
Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):811-823. PubMed ID: 35450702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-response optimisation analysis of material properties in dental restorative composites under the influence of thermal and thermomechanical stimuli - A 3D finite element study.
Thadathil Varghese J; Islam F; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty BG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Feb; 150():106363. PubMed ID: 38169207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of dental restoration depth, internal cavity angle, and material properties on biomechanical resistance of a treated molar tooth.
Babaei B; Cella S; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty BG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Sep; 133():105305. PubMed ID: 35700676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Heat Transfer and Thermal Stress Analysis of a Mandibular Molar Tooth Restored by Different Indirect Restorations Using a Three-Dimensional Finite Element Method.
Çelik Köycü B; İmirzalıoğlu P
J Prosthodont; 2017 Jul; 26(5):460-473. PubMed ID: 26618930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transient thermal and stress analysis of maxillary second premolar tooth using an exact three-dimensional model.
Hashemipour MA; Mohammadpour A; Nassab SA
Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 20657080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress distribution of bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Martorelli M; Sorrentino R; Gloria A
Am J Dent; 2017 Aug; 30(4):227-232. PubMed ID: 29178706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of cavity-margin-angles and bolus stiffness on the mechanical behavior of indirect resin composite class II restorations.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Garcia-Godoy F; Gloria A; Lanzotti A; Maietta S; Martorelli M
Dent Mater; 2017 Jan; 33(1):e39-e47. PubMed ID: 27890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhancing the mechanical stability of restored teeth with interfacial cracks: Finite element analysis.
Babaei B; Prusty BG
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Dec; 148():106191. PubMed ID: 37847958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations.
Arola D; Galles LA; Sarubin MF
J Dent; 2001 Jan; 29(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 11137640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining structural-thermal coupled field FE analysis and the Taguchi method to evaluate the relative contributions of multi-factors in a premolar adhesive MOD restoration.
Lin CL; Chang YH; Lin YF
J Dent; 2008 Aug; 36(8):626-36. PubMed ID: 18550252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique.
Rosatto CM; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Bragança GF; Rodrigues MP; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1519-28. PubMed ID: 26449641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of dental restoration geometry and material properties on biomechanical behaviour of a treated molar tooth: A 3D finite element analysis.
Babaei B; Shouha P; Birman V; Farrar P; Prentice L; Prusty G
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Jan; 125():104892. PubMed ID: 34688146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stress-strain Analysis of Premolars With Non-carious Cervical Lesions: Influence of Restorative Material, Loading Direction and Mechanical Fatigue.
Machado AC; Soares CJ; Reis BR; Bicalho AA; Raposo L; Soares PV
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(3):253-265. PubMed ID: 28467256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites.
Ausiello P; Apicella A; Davidson CL; Rengo S
J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1269-77. PubMed ID: 11522306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative Evaluation of Various Temperature Changes on Stress Distribution in Class II Mesial-occlusal-distal Preparation restored with Different Restorative Materials: A Finite Element Analysis.
Srivastava B; N Devi N; Gupta N; Singh R
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2018; 11(3):167-170. PubMed ID: 30131635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element analysis of thermal stress distribution in different restorative materials used in class V cavities.
Guler MS; Guler C; Cakici F; Cakici EB; Sen S
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 26755215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of minimally invasive endodontic access cavities and bonding status of resin composites on the mechanical property of endodontically-treated teeth: A finite element study.
Lin F; Ordinola-Zapata R; Fok ASL; Lee R
Dent Mater; 2022 Feb; 38(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 34930622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
