131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35450847)
1. Too Late Allergic Reaction in a Patient with Permanent Pacemaker.
Akkuş F; Taylan G
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2022 Apr; 50(3):225-227. PubMed ID: 35450847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Telangiectatic erythematous cutaneous reaction to an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
Ferringer T; Mowad C
Am J Contact Dermat; 2003 Mar; 14(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 14744422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Entirely polytetrafluoroethylene coating for pacemaker system contact dermatitis.
Tamenishi A; Usui A; Oshima H; Ueda Y
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 7(2):275-7. PubMed ID: 18063607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pacemaker contact sensitivity: clinical recognition and management.
Abdallah HI; Balsara RK; O'Riordan AC
Ann Thorac Surg; 1994 Apr; 57(4):1017-8. PubMed ID: 8166499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Contact dermatitis following cardiac pacemaker implantation].
Moïni C; d'Alteroche A; Cosnay P; Vaillant L; Babuty D; Delhomme C; Charniot JC; Fauchier JP
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1996 Feb; 89(2):253-6. PubMed ID: 8678758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An Unusual Case of Contact Dermatitis Caused by a Pacemaker Implanted for Neurostimulation.
Pérez González EL; Medina Alfaro I; Iglesias Cadarso A; Boteanu C
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol; 2017; 27(4):272-273. PubMed ID: 28731418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Allergic Contact Dermatitis to a Cell Phone.
Tammaro A; Magri F; Pigliacelli F; Gelormini E; Parisella Francesca R; Chello C; Persechino S
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2018 Dec; 26(4):339-340. PubMed ID: 30665487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pacemaker dermatitis from titanium.
Yamauchi R; Morita A; Tsuji T
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Jan; 42(1):52-3. PubMed ID: 10644034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Systemic contact dermatitis and allergy to biomedical devices.
Aquino M; Mucci T
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep; 2013 Oct; 13(5):518-27. PubMed ID: 23843126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pacemaker allergy.
Ljubojević Hadžavdić S; Murtezani I; Bradamante M; Ilic B
Contact Dermatitis; 2017 May; 76(5):307-309. PubMed ID: 28386971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pacemaker contact sensitivity.
Peters MS; Schroeter AL; van Hale HM; Broadbent JC
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Oct; 11(4):214-8. PubMed ID: 6499423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contact sensitivity to polychloroparaxylene-coated cardiac pacemaker.
Iguchi N; Kasanuki H; Matsuda N; Shoda M; Ohnishi S; Hosoda S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 20(2 Pt 1):372-3. PubMed ID: 9058881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Chronic depigmentation due to positive patch tests for methacryate derivatives].
Casse V; Salmon-Ehr V; Mohn C; Kalis B
Ann Dermatol Venereol; 1998 Jan; 125(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 9747212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vesicular Contact Reaction May Progress into Erythema Multiforme.
Czarnecka-Operacz M; Jenerowicz D; Szulczyńska-Gabor J; Teresiak-Mikołajczak E; Szyfter-Harris J; Bowszyc-Dmochowska M
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2016 Dec; 24(4):307-309. PubMed ID: 28128086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective evaluation of patch testing before or after metal device implantation.
Reed KB; Davis MD; Nakamura K; Hanson L; Richardson DM
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 144(8):999-1007. PubMed ID: 18711071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Results of Hairdressing Series Patch Test in Patients with Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Para-phenylenediamine; Are there any Safe Alternatives?
Park MY; Kim WJ; Kim HS; Kim BS; Kim MB; Ko HC
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2017 Dec; 25(4):307-309. PubMed ID: 30064608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Persisting allergic patch test reaction to minoxidil manifested as cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia.
García-Rodiño S; Espasandín-Arias M; Suárez-Peñaranda JM; Rodríguez-Granados MT; Vázquez-Veiga H; Fernández-Redondo V
Contact Dermatitis; 2015 Jun; 72(6):413-6. PubMed ID: 25801327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by capryloyl glycine in an atopic dermatitis patient.
Navarro-Triviño FJ; Ayén-Rodríguez Á; Ruiz-Villaverde R
Australas J Dermatol; 2022 Aug; 63(3):e259-e261. PubMed ID: 35460572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Allergic contact dermatitis to detergents: a multicenter study to assess prevalence.
Belsito DV; Fransway AF; Fowler JF; Sherertz EF; Maibach HI; Mark JG; Mathias CG; Rietschel RL; Storrs FJ; Nethercott JR
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2002 Feb; 46(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 11807430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound assessment of reactive lymphadenopathies due to extreme reactions from patch tests.
Molina-Figuera E; Gatica-Ortega ME; Pastor-Nieto MA; Torres-Aranda R; García-Olmedo OA; Pérez-Hortet C
Contact Dermatitis; 2021 Feb; 84(2):136-138. PubMed ID: 32885453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
