BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35451132)

  • 21. A Single Transcript CRISPR-Cas9 System for Multiplex Genome Editing in Plants.
    Tang X; Zhong Z; Ren Q; Liu B; Zhang Y
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1917():75-82. PubMed ID: 30610629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. CRISPR-Based Genome Editing: Advancements and Opportunities for Rice Improvement.
    Zegeye WA; Tsegaw M; Zhang Y; Cao L
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Apr; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 35457271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Resistance against Viruses in Plants.
    Khan ZA; Kumar R; Dasgupta I
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 35216418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficient Cas9 multiplex editing using unspaced sgRNA arrays engineering in a Potato virus X vector.
    Uranga M; Aragonés V; Selma S; Vázquez-Vilar M; Orzáez D; Daròs JA
    Plant J; 2021 Apr; 106(2):555-565. PubMed ID: 33484202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Large-scale genome editing in plants: approaches, applications, and future perspectives.
    Liu T; Zhang X; Li K; Yao Q; Zhong D; Deng Q; Lu Y
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2023 Feb; 79():102875. PubMed ID: 36610369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gene Editing in Sorghum Through Agrobacterium.
    Sander JD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1931():155-168. PubMed ID: 30652289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. General guidelines for CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing in plants.
    Aksoy E; Yildirim K; Kavas M; Kayihan C; Yerlikaya BA; Çalik I; Sevgen İ; Demirel U
    Mol Biol Rep; 2022 Dec; 49(12):12151-12164. PubMed ID: 36107373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Engineered biocontainable RNA virus vectors for non-transgenic genome editing across crop species and genotypes.
    Liu Q; Zhao C; Sun K; Deng Y; Li Z
    Mol Plant; 2023 Mar; 16(3):616-631. PubMed ID: 36751129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An efficient and specific CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing system targeting soybean phytoene desaturase genes.
    Lu QSM; Tian L
    BMC Biotechnol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):7. PubMed ID: 35168613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Improvement of Crops Using the CRISPR/Cas System: New Target Genes].
    Ukhatova YV; Erastenkova MV; Korshikova ES; Krylova EA; Mikhailova AS; Semilet TV; Tikhonova NG; Shvachko NA; Khlestkina EK
    Mol Biol (Mosk); 2023; 57(3):387-410. PubMed ID: 37326044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rapid generation of genetic diversity by multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in rice.
    Shen L; Hua Y; Fu Y; Li J; Liu Q; Jiao X; Xin G; Wang J; Wang X; Yan C; Wang K
    Sci China Life Sci; 2017 May; 60(5):506-515. PubMed ID: 28349304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of genome editing techniques to regulate gene expression in crops.
    Dong H
    BMC Plant Biol; 2024 Feb; 24(1):100. PubMed ID: 38331711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genome Editing by CRISPR/Cas9 in Sorghum Through Biolistic Bombardment.
    Liu G; Li J; Godwin ID
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1931():169-183. PubMed ID: 30652290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. CRISPR Variants for Gene Editing in Plants: Biosafety Risks and Future Directions.
    Movahedi A; Aghaei-Dargiri S; Li H; Zhuge Q; Sun W
    Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Nov; 24(22):. PubMed ID: 38003431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. CRISPR-Cas9 Application in Canadian Public and Private Plant Breeding.
    Gleim S; Lubieniechi S; Smyth SJ
    CRISPR J; 2020 Feb; 3(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 32091256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. CRISPR/Cas9 System: A Potential Tool for Genetic Improvement in Floricultural Crops.
    Sirohi U; Kumar M; Sharma VR; Teotia S; Singh D; Chaudhary V; Priya ; Yadav MK
    Mol Biotechnol; 2022 Dec; 64(12):1303-1318. PubMed ID: 35751797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mimicking natural polymorphism in eIF4E by CRISPR-Cas9 base editing is associated with resistance to potyviruses.
    Bastet A; Zafirov D; Giovinazzo N; Guyon-Debast A; Nogué F; Robaglia C; Gallois JL
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2019 Sep; 17(9):1736-1750. PubMed ID: 30784179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CRISPR/Cas-mediated plant genome editing: outstanding challenges a decade after implementation.
    Cardi T; Murovec J; Bakhsh A; Boniecka J; Bruegmann T; Bull SE; Eeckhaut T; Fladung M; Galovic V; Linkiewicz A; Lukan T; Mafra I; Michalski K; Kavas M; Nicolia A; Nowakowska J; Sági L; Sarmiento C; Yıldırım K; Zlatković M; Hensel G; Van Laere K
    Trends Plant Sci; 2023 Oct; 28(10):1144-1165. PubMed ID: 37331842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing tools and their possible role in disease resistance mechanism.
    Kumari D; Prasad BD; Dwivedi P; Hidangmayum A; Sahni S
    Mol Biol Rep; 2022 Dec; 49(12):11587-11600. PubMed ID: 36104588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Engineering of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated potyvirus resistance in transgene-free Arabidopsis plants.
    Pyott DE; Sheehan E; Molnar A
    Mol Plant Pathol; 2016 Oct; 17(8):1276-88. PubMed ID: 27103354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.