These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35451262)

  • 1. The negative appendicectomy rate at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital - a 10-year review.
    Grossberg SJ; Brener JD; Bizos EL; Candy GP; Bizos DB
    S Afr J Surg; 2022 Mar; 60(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 35451262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative appendicectomy rates as a quality measure in a regional surgical unit: a retrospective review.
    Donlon NE; Kelly ME; Sheppard A; Davern M; Nugent TS; Boland PA; Corless K; Khan W; Khan I; Waldron R; Barry K
    Ir J Med Sci; 2021 May; 190(2):755-761. PubMed ID: 32915371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pre-Operative Imaging can Reduce Negative Appendectomy Rate in Acute Appendicitis.
    Chan J; Fan KS; Mak TLA; Loh SY; Ng SWY; Adapala R
    Ulster Med J; 2020 Jan; 89(1):25-28. PubMed ID: 32218624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Negative Appendicectomy Rates in Females of Childbearing Age: A Retrospective Analysis and Literature Review.
    Hatem F; Baig H; Khaldas F; Lucocq J
    Cureus; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e27412. PubMed ID: 36051710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Negative appendicectomy rate as a quality metric in the management of appendicitis: impact of computed tomography, Alvarado score and the definition of negative appendicectomy.
    Mariadason JG; Wang WN; Wallack MK; Belmonte A; Matari H
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2012 Sep; 94(6):395-401. PubMed ID: 22943328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. One year negative appendicectomy rates at a district general hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Lim J; Pang Q; Alexander R
    Int J Surg; 2016 Jul; 31():1-4. PubMed ID: 27174508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Negative appendicectomy: evaluation of ultrasonography and Alvarado score.
    Kundiona I; Chihaka OB; Muguti GI
    Cent Afr J Med; 2015; 61(9-12):66-73. PubMed ID: 29144064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cohort study of 1241 patients to identify predictors of negative appendicectomy.
    Mackay TG; Dissanayake B; Yuide PJ; Burstow MJ; Gundara JS; Chua TC
    ANZ J Surg; 2020 Oct; 90(10):1984-1990. PubMed ID: 32808480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of the Increased Use of Preoperative Imaging and Laparoscopy on Appendicectomy Outcomes.
    Sridhar AN; Andrikopoulou M; Clarke L; Ashley C; Mekhail P; Khan UA
    Indian J Surg; 2015 Dec; 77(Suppl 2):356-60. PubMed ID: 26730025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Routine Computed Tomography Versus Selective Imaging: An Audit of Negative Appendicectomy Rates in Two Hospitals.
    Symonds T; Buschel H; Avramovic J; Palamuthusingam P
    Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32389. PubMed ID: 36632248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Negative Appendicectomy Rate: Incidence and Predictors.
    Noureldin K; Hatim Ali AA; Issa M; Shah H; Ayantunde B; Ayantunde A
    Cureus; 2022 Jan; 14(1):e21489. PubMed ID: 35223267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Defining the current negative appendectomy rate: for whom is preoperative computed tomography making an impact?
    Wagner PL; Eachempati SR; Soe K; Pieracci FM; Shou J; Barie PS
    Surgery; 2008 Aug; 144(2):276-82. PubMed ID: 18656636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective.
    Raja AS; Wright C; Sodickson AD; Zane RD; Schiff GD; Hanson R; Baeyens PF; Khorasani R
    Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):460-5. PubMed ID: 20529988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of routine imaging of suspected appendicitis.
    D'Souza N; Marsden M; Bottomley S; Nagarajah N; Scutt F; Toh S
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2018 Jan; 100(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 29046077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis.
    D'Souza N; D'Souza C; Grant D; Royston E; Farouk M
    Int J Surg; 2015 Jan; 13():165-169. PubMed ID: 25499245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acute appendicitis: is removal of a normal appendix still existing and can we reduce its rate?
    Khairy G
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2009; 15(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 19636177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pathologies of the appendix: a 10-year review of 4670 appendicectomy specimens.
    Chandrasegaram MD; Rothwell LA; An EI; Miller RJ
    ANZ J Surg; 2012 Nov; 82(11):844-7. PubMed ID: 22924871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased use of pre-operative imaging and laparoscopy has no impact on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing appendicectomy.
    Markar SR; Karthikesalingam A; Cunningham J; Burd C; Bond-Smith G; Kurzawinski TR
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2011 Nov; 93(8):620-3. PubMed ID: 22041239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of imaging in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study.
    Perrotta G; Geropoulos G; Bhan C
    Updates Surg; 2023 Jan; 75(1):205-208. PubMed ID: 36422811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimens at a district hospital of Saudi Arabia.
    Jat MA; Al-Swailmi FK; Mehmood Y; Alrowaili M; Alanazi S
    Pak J Med Sci; 2015; 31(4):891-4. PubMed ID: 26430424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.