339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35452836)
1. Development and validation of a risk-based algorithm for preoperative type and screen testing in spine surgery.
Turcotte JJ; Holbert SE; Orlov MD; Patton CM
Spine J; 2022 Sep; 22(9):1472-1480. PubMed ID: 35452836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and Validation of a Risk-Prediction Nomogram for Preoperative Blood Type and Antibody Testing in Spinal Fusion Surgery.
Wu L; Peng X; Zhuo X; Zhu G; Xie X
Orthop Surg; 2024 Jan; 16(1):111-122. PubMed ID: 38044447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator Predict 30-day Complications After Spine Surgery?
McCarthy MH; Singh P; Nayak R; Maslak JP; Jenkins TJ; Patel AA; Hsu WK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):621-628. PubMed ID: 31770319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a Risk Prediction Model With Improved Clinical Utility in Elective Cervical and Lumbar Spine Surgery.
Broda A; Sanford Z; Turcotte J; Patton C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):E542-E551. PubMed ID: 31770338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Results of Database Studies in Spine Surgery Can Be Influenced by Missing Data.
Basques BA; McLynn RP; Fice MP; Samuel AM; Lukasiewicz AM; Bohl DD; Ahn J; Singh K; Grauer JN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):2893-2904. PubMed ID: 27896677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anterior and posterior cervical fusion in patients with high body mass index are not associated with greater complications.
Buerba RA; Fu MC; Grauer JN
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1643-53. PubMed ID: 24388595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting complication risk in spine surgery: a prospective analysis of a novel risk assessment tool.
Veeravagu A; Li A; Swinney C; Tian L; Moraff A; Azad TD; Cheng I; Alamin T; Hu SS; Anderson RL; Shuer L; Desai A; Park J; Olshen RA; Ratliff JK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jul; 27(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 28430052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and validation of a novel scoring tool for predicting facility discharge after elective posterior lumbar fusion.
Harada GK; Basques BA; Samartzis D; Goldberg EJ; Colman MW; An HS
Spine J; 2020 Oct; 20(10):1629-1637. PubMed ID: 32135302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting nonroutine discharge after elective spine surgery: external validation of machine learning algorithms.
Stopa BM; Robertson FC; Karhade AV; Chua M; Broekman MLD; Schwab JH; Smith TR; Gormley WB
J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Jul; 31(5):742-747. PubMed ID: 31349223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator Predict 30-Day Complications After Cervical Spine Surgery?
McCarthy MH; Singh P; Maslak J; Nayak R; Jenkins TJ; Hsu WK; Patel AA
Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Nov; 32(9):357-362. PubMed ID: 31567532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgeon specialty and outcomes after elective spine surgery.
Seicean A; Alan N; Seicean S; Neuhauser D; Benzel EC; Weil RJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):1605-13. PubMed ID: 24983930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Liver disease is an independent predictor of poor 30-day outcomes following surgery for degenerative disease of the cervical spine.
Goel NJ; Agarwal P; Mallela AN; Abdullah KG; Ali ZS; Ozturk AK; Malhotra NR; Schuster JM; Chen HI
Spine J; 2019 Mar; 19(3):448-460. PubMed ID: 30053522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A predictive model of complications after spine surgery: the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2005-2010.
Bekelis K; Desai A; Bakhoum SF; Missios S
Spine J; 2014 Jul; 14(7):1247-55. PubMed ID: 24211097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The utility of preoperative laboratories in predicting postoperative complications following posterolateral lumbar fusion.
Lakomkin N; Goz V; Cheng JS; Brodke DS; Spiker WR
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):993-997. PubMed ID: 29055738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk factors and pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in elective spine surgery.
McLynn RP; Diaz-Collado PJ; Ottesen TD; Ondeck NT; Cui JJ; Bovonratwet P; Shultz BN; Grauer JN
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):970-978. PubMed ID: 29056565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using a national surgical database to predict complications following posterior lumbar surgery and comparing the area under the curve and F1-score for the assessment of prognostic capability.
DeVries Z; Locke E; Hoda M; Moravek D; Phan K; Stratton A; Kingwell S; Wai EK; Phan P
Spine J; 2021 Jul; 21(7):1135-1142. PubMed ID: 33601012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Obese Class III patients at significantly greater risk of multiple complications after lumbar surgery: an analysis of 10,387 patients in the ACS NSQIP database.
Buerba RA; Fu MC; Gruskay JA; Long WD; Grauer JN
Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2008-18. PubMed ID: 24316118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the Performance of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator in Elective Spine Surgery: Insights from Patients Undergoing Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Fusion.
Sebastian A; Goyal A; Alvi MA; Wahood W; Elminawy M; Habermann EB; Bydon M
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e323-e329. PubMed ID: 30822574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using the ACS-NSQIP to identify factors affecting hospital length of stay after elective posterior lumbar fusion.
Basques BA; Fu MC; Buerba RA; Bohl DD; Golinvaux NS; Grauer JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):497-502. PubMed ID: 24384669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk factors for immediate postoperative complications and mortality following spine surgery: a study of 3475 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Schoenfeld AJ; Ochoa LM; Bader JO; Belmont PJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Sep; 93(17):1577-82. PubMed ID: 21915571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
