These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35455124)

  • 1. A Maximal Correlation Framework for Fair Machine Learning.
    Lee J; Bu Y; Sattigeri P; Panda R; Wornell GW; Karlinsky L; Schmidt Feris R
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Mar; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 35455124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning Fair Representations via Distance Correlation Minimization.
    Guo D; Wang C; Wang B; Zha H
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2024 Feb; 35(2):2139-2152. PubMed ID: 35969542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enabling Fairness in Healthcare Through Machine Learning.
    Grote T; Keeling G
    Ethics Inf Technol; 2022; 24(3):39. PubMed ID: 36060496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SLIDE: A surrogate fairness constraint to ensure fairness consistency.
    Kim K; Ohn I; Kim S; Kim Y
    Neural Netw; 2022 Oct; 154():441-454. PubMed ID: 35964434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An empirical characterization of fair machine learning for clinical risk prediction.
    Pfohl SR; Foryciarz A; Shah NH
    J Biomed Inform; 2021 Jan; 113():103621. PubMed ID: 33220494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictably unequal: understanding and addressing concerns that algorithmic clinical prediction may increase health disparities.
    Paulus JK; Kent DM
    NPJ Digit Med; 2020; 3():99. PubMed ID: 32821854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Addressing Fairness, Bias, and Appropriate Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Global Health.
    Fletcher RR; Nakeshimana A; Olubeko O
    Front Artif Intell; 2020; 3():561802. PubMed ID: 33981989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can medical algorithms be fair? Three ethical quandaries and one dilemma.
    Bærøe K; Gundersen T; Henden E; Rommetveit K
    BMJ Health Care Inform; 2022 Apr; 29(1):. PubMed ID: 35396245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metrics and Algorithms for Locally Fair and Accurate Classifications using Ensembles.
    Lässig N; Oppold S; Herschel M
    Datenbank Spektrum; 2022; 22(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 35069064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fair Representation: Guaranteeing Approximate Multiple Group Fairness for Unknown Tasks.
    Shen X; Wong Y; Kankanhalli M
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2023 Jan; 45(1):525-538. PubMed ID: 35130150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utilizing data sampling techniques on algorithmic fairness for customer churn prediction with data imbalance problems.
    Maw M; Haw SC; Ho CK
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():988. PubMed ID: 36071889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A joint fairness model with applications to risk predictions for underrepresented populations.
    Do H; Nandi S; Putzel P; Smyth P; Zhong J
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):826-840. PubMed ID: 35142367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fair Generalized Linear Models with a Convex Penalty.
    Do H; Putzel P; Martin A; Smyth P; Zhong J
    Proc Mach Learn Res; 2022 Jul; 162():5286-5308. PubMed ID: 37016636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward Learning Trustworthily from Data Combining Privacy, Fairness, and Explainability: An Application to Face Recognition.
    Franco D; Oneto L; Navarin N; Anguita D
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Aug; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 34441187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FairALM: Augmented Lagrangian Method for Training Fair Models with Little Regret.
    Lokhande VS; Akash AK; Ravi SN; Singh V
    Comput Vis ECCV; 2020 Aug; 12357():365-381. PubMed ID: 33462570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On Consequentialism and Fairness.
    Card D; Smith NA
    Front Artif Intell; 2020; 3():34. PubMed ID: 33733152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tuning Fairness by Balancing Target Labels.
    Kehrenberg T; Chen Z; Quadrianto N
    Front Artif Intell; 2020; 3():33. PubMed ID: 33733151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facing the Challenges of Developing Fair Risk Scoring Models.
    Szepannek G; Lübke K
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():681915. PubMed ID: 34723172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of fairness in algorithmic decisions: Future developers' perspective.
    Kleanthous S; Kasinidou M; Barlas P; Otterbacher J
    Patterns (N Y); 2022 Jan; 3(1):100380. PubMed ID: 35079711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolution and impact of bias in human and machine learning algorithm interaction.
    Sun W; Nasraoui O; Shafto P
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0235502. PubMed ID: 32790666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.