These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35458706)

  • 1. Using Big Data Analytics to "Back Engineer" Protein Conformational Selection Mechanisms.
    Gupta S; Baudry J; Menon V
    Molecules; 2022 Apr; 27(8):. PubMed ID: 35458706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Big Data analytics for improved prediction of ligand binding and conformational selection.
    Gupta S; Baudry J; Menon V
    Front Mol Biosci; 2022; 9():953984. PubMed ID: 36710883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel Big Data-Driven Machine Learning Models for Drug Discovery Application.
    Sripriya Akondi V; Menon V; Baudry J; Whittle J
    Molecules; 2022 Jan; 27(3):. PubMed ID: 35163865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ensembling machine learning models to boost molecular affinity prediction.
    Druchok M; Yarish D; Garkot S; Nikolaienko T; Gurbych O
    Comput Biol Chem; 2021 Aug; 93():107529. PubMed ID: 34192653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence of conformational selection driving the formation of ligand binding sites in protein-protein interfaces.
    Bohnuud T; Kozakov D; Vajda S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2014 Oct; 10(10):e1003872. PubMed ID: 25275445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classifying kinase conformations using a machine learning approach.
    McSkimming DI; Rasheed K; Kannan N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):86. PubMed ID: 28152981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Machine learning and big data analytics in bipolar disorder: A position paper from the International Society for Bipolar Disorders Big Data Task Force.
    Passos IC; Ballester PL; Barros RC; Librenza-Garcia D; Mwangi B; Birmaher B; Brietzke E; Hajek T; Lopez Jaramillo C; Mansur RB; Alda M; Haarman BCM; Isometsa E; Lam RW; McIntyre RS; Minuzzi L; Kessing LV; Yatham LN; Duffy A; Kapczinski F
    Bipolar Disord; 2019 Nov; 21(7):582-594. PubMed ID: 31465619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resolving Protein Conformational Plasticity and Substrate Binding via Machine Learning.
    Ahalawat N; Sahil M; Mondal J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 May; 19(9):2644-2657. PubMed ID: 37068044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ensemble Docking in Drug Discovery: How Many Protein Configurations from Molecular Dynamics Simulations are Needed To Reproduce Known Ligand Binding?
    Evangelista Falcon W; Ellingson SR; Smith JC; Baudry J
    J Phys Chem B; 2019 Jun; 123(25):5189-5195. PubMed ID: 30695645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Druggability Assessment in TRAPP Using Machine Learning Approaches.
    Yuan JH; Han SB; Richter S; Wade RC; Kokh DB
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Mar; 60(3):1685-1699. PubMed ID: 32105476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of conformational ensembles in ligand recognition in G-protein coupled receptors.
    Niesen MJ; Bhattacharya S; Vaidehi N
    J Am Chem Soc; 2011 Aug; 133(33):13197-204. PubMed ID: 21766860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conformational readout of RNA by small ligands.
    Kligun E; Mandel-Gutfreund Y
    RNA Biol; 2013 Jun; 10(6):982-9. PubMed ID: 23618839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can we separate active from inactive conformations?
    Diller DJ; Merz KM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2002 Feb; 16(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 12188020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Redefining the Protein Kinase Conformational Space with Machine Learning.
    Ung PM; Rahman R; Schlessinger A
    Cell Chem Biol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):916-924.e2. PubMed ID: 29861272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binding Activity Prediction of Cyclin-Dependent Inhibitors.
    Saha I; Rak B; Bhowmick SS; Maulik U; Bhattacharjee D; Koch U; Lazniewski M; Plewczynski D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1469-82. PubMed ID: 26079845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ligand- and mutation-induced conformational selection in the CCR5 chemokine G protein-coupled receptor.
    Abrol R; Trzaskowski B; Goddard WA; Nesterov A; Olave I; Irons C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111(36):13040-5. PubMed ID: 25157173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Molecular modelling prediction of ligand binding site flexibility.
    Yang AY; Källblad P; Mancera RL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2004 Apr; 18(4):235-50. PubMed ID: 15562988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.