334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35459522)
1. A comparison of fertility preservation outcomes in patients who froze oocytes, embryos, or ovarian tissue for medically indicated circumstances: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ní Dhonnabháin B; Elfaki N; Fraser K; Petrie A; Jones BP; Saso S; Hardiman PJ; Getreu N
Fertil Steril; 2022 Jun; 117(6):1266-1276. PubMed ID: 35459522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Live birth rate after female fertility preservation for cancer or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the three main techniques; embryo, oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation.
Fraison E; Huberlant S; Labrune E; Cavalieri M; Montagut M; Brugnon F; Courbiere B
Hum Reprod; 2023 Mar; 38(3):489-502. PubMed ID: 36421038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Random Start Ovarian Stimulation for Oocyte or Embryo Cryopreservation in Women Desiring Fertility Preservation Prior to Gonadotoxic Cancer Therapy.
Danis RB; Pereira N; Elias RT
Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 18(8):609-613. PubMed ID: 28786354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.
Goldman RH; Racowsky C; Farland LV; Munné S; Ribustello L; Fox JH
Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):853-859. PubMed ID: 28166330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combining fertility preservation procedures to spread the eggs across different baskets: a feasibility study.
Delattre S; Segers I; Van Moer E; Drakopoulos P; Mateizel I; Enghels L; Tournaye H; De Vos M
Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2524-2536. PubMed ID: 32951035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.
Doyle JO; Richter KS; Lim J; Stillman RJ; Graham JR; Tucker MJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):459-66.e2. PubMed ID: 26604065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oocyte cryopreservation review: outcomes of medical oocyte cryopreservation and planned oocyte cryopreservation.
Walker Z; Lanes A; Ginsburg E
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2022 Jan; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 34996479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective study of women and girls undergoing fertility preservation due to oncologic and non-oncologic indications in Sweden-Trends in patients' choices and benefit of the chosen methods after long-term follow up.
Rodriguez-Wallberg KA; Marklund A; Lundberg F; Wikander I; Milenkovic M; Anastacio A; Sergouniotis F; Wånggren K; Ekengren J; Lind T; Borgström B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 May; 98(5):604-615. PubMed ID: 30723910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Live births following fertility preservation using in-vitro maturation of ovarian tissue oocytes.
Segers I; Bardhi E; Mateizel I; Van Moer E; Schots R; Verheyen G; Tournaye H; De Vos M
Hum Reprod; 2020 Sep; 35(9):2026-2036. PubMed ID: 32829388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experiences and intentions of patients undergoing medically indicated oocyte or embryo cryopreservation: a qualitative study.
Bayefsky MJ; Sampson A; Blakemore JK; Jalili D; Lilly AG; Fino ME; Quinn GP
Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan; 39(1):147-153. PubMed ID: 37944107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fresh and cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation for preserving reproductive and endocrine function: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
Khattak H; Malhas R; Craciunas L; Afifi Y; Amorim CA; Fishel S; Silber S; Gook D; Demeestere I; Bystrova O; Lisyanskaya A; Manikhas G; Lotz L; Dittrich R; Colmorn LB; Macklon KT; Hjorth IMD; Kristensen SG; Gallos I; Coomarasamy A
Hum Reprod Update; 2022 May; 28(3):400-416. PubMed ID: 35199164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Update on fertility preservation from the Barcelona International Society for Fertility Preservation-ESHRE-ASRM 2015 expert meeting: indications, results and future perspectives.
Martinez F
Hum Reprod; 2017 Sep; 32(9):1802-1811. PubMed ID: 29117320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproductive outcomes after in vitro fertilization treatment in a cohort of Danish women transplanted with cryopreserved ovarian tissue.
Dueholm Hjorth IM; Kristensen SG; Dueholm M; Humaidan P
Fertil Steril; 2020 Aug; 114(2):379-387. PubMed ID: 32624219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Live birth rate after use of cryopreserved oocytes or embryos at the time of cancer diagnosis in female survivors: a retrospective study of ten years of experience.
Mayeur A; Puy V; Windal V; Hesters L; Gallot V; Benoit A; Grynberg M; Sonigo C; Frydman N
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2021 Jul; 38(7):1767-1775. PubMed ID: 33797007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fertility preservation after gonadotoxic treatments for cancer and autoimmune diseases.
Saito S; Yamada M; Yano R; Takahashi K; Ebara A; Sakanaka H; Matsumoto M; Ishimaru T; Utsuno H; Matsuzawa Y; Ooka R; Fukuoka M; Akashi K; Kamijo S; Hamatani T; Tanaka M
J Ovarian Res; 2023 Aug; 16(1):159. PubMed ID: 37563616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhancing the scope of in vitro maturation for fertility preservation: transvaginal retrieval of immature oocytes during endoscopic gynaecological procedures.
Song XL; Lu CL; Zheng XY; Nisenblat V; Zhen XM; Yang R; Li M; Li R; Yuan YF; Ma CH; Liu P; Feng HL; Yan J; Qiao J
Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):837-846. PubMed ID: 32154563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence-based outcomes after oocyte cryopreservation for donor oocyte in vitro fertilization and planned oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline.
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jul; 116(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 34148587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fertility preservation in female oncology patients: the influence of the type of cancer on ovarian stimulation response.
Alvarez RM; Ramanathan P
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):2051-2059. PubMed ID: 27370358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos.
Ho JR; Woo I; Louie K; Salem W; Jabara SI; Bendikson KA; Paulson RJ; Chung K
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Oct; 34(10):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 28718080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
