133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35459634)
1. Re: Riman et al. Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset.
Buckleton J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Wivell R; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Benschop C; Budowle B; Coble M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102709. PubMed ID: 35459634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset.
Riman S; Iyer H; Vallone PM
PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256714. PubMed ID: 34534241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A response to a correspondence letter by Buckleton et al. on: Riman et al. (2021) Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset, PLoS One 16(9):e0256714.
Riman S; Iyer H; Vallone PM
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102710. PubMed ID: 35466047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of likelihood ratios obtained from EuroForMix and STRmix™.
Cheng K; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Curran J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2138-2155. PubMed ID: 34553371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developmental validation of STRmix™, expert software for the interpretation of forensic DNA profiles.
Bright JA; Taylor D; McGovern C; Cooper S; Russell L; Abarno D; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jul; 23():226-239. PubMed ID: 27235797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. STRmix™ collaborative exercise on DNA mixture interpretation.
Bright JA; Cheng K; Kerr Z; McGovern C; Kelly H; Moretti TR; Smith MA; Bieber FR; Budowle B; Coble MD; Alghafri R; Allen PS; Barber A; Beamer V; Buettner C; Russell M; Gehrig C; Hicks T; Charak J; Cheong-Wing K; Ciecko A; Davis CT; Donley M; Pedersen N; Gartside B; Granger D; Greer-Ritzheimer M; Reisinger E; Kennedy J; Grammer E; Kaplan M; Hansen D; Larsen HJ; Laureano A; Li C; Lien E; Lindberg E; Kelly C; Mallinder B; Malsom S; Yacovone-Margetts A; McWhorter A; Prajapati SM; Powell T; Shutler G; Stevenson K; Stonehouse AR; Smith L; Murakami J; Halsing E; Wright D; Clark L; Taylor DA; Buckleton J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():1-8. PubMed ID: 30665115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Probabilistic genotyping software: An overview.
Coble MD; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():219-224. PubMed ID: 30458407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of a method for weighting a range in the number of contributors in probabilistic genotyping.
McGovern C; Cheng K; Kelly H; Ciecko A; Taylor D; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102352. PubMed ID: 32707473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Commentary on: Thompson WC. Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: A case study comparing STRmix™ and TrueAllele®. J Forensic Sci. 2023;68(3):1049-63.
Perlin MW; Butt N; Wilson MR
J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jul; 69(4):1516-1518. PubMed ID: 38664900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. EFMrep: An extension of EuroForMix for improved combination of STR DNA mixture profiles.
Bleka Ø; Prieto L; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Nov; 61():102771. PubMed ID: 36075175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Commentary on: Thompson WC. Uncertainty in probabilistic genotyping of low template DNA: a case study comparing STRmix™ and TrueAllele™. J Forensic Sci. 2023;68 (3):1049-63. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15225.
Kalafut T; Curran JM; Coble MD; Buckleton J
J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):371-377. PubMed ID: 37877323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An Investigation into Compound Likelihood Ratios for Forensic DNA Mixtures.
Wivell R; Kelly H; Kokoszka J; Daniels J; Dickson L; Buckleton J; Bright JA
Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating DNA Mixtures with Contributors from Different Populations Using Probabilistic Genotyping.
Kruijver M; Kelly H; Bright JA; Buckleton J
Genes (Basel); 2022 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 36672780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MaSTR™: an effective probabilistic genotyping tool for interpretation of STR mixtures associated with differentially degraded DNA.
Holland MM; Tiedge TM; Bender AJ; Gaston-Sanchez SA; McElhoe JA
Int J Legal Med; 2022 Mar; 136(2):433-446. PubMed ID: 35092470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Probabilistic Genotyping Software STRmix: Utility and Evidence for its Validity.
Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Gittelson S; Moretti TR; Onorato AJ; Bieber FR; Budowle B; Taylor DA
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):393-405. PubMed ID: 30132900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An assessment of the performance of the probabilistic genotyping software EuroForMix: Trends in likelihood ratios and analysis of Type I & II errors.
Benschop CCG; Nijveld A; Duijs FE; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():31-38. PubMed ID: 31212207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo genotyping algorithm on PROVEDIt mixtures including a novel precision benchmark.
Susik M; Sbalzarini IF
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 May; 64():102840. PubMed ID: 36764220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New York State TrueAllele ® casework validation study.
Perlin MW; Belrose JL; Duceman BW
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1458-66. PubMed ID: 23865896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
