These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35459634)

  • 41. Casework applications of probabilistic genotyping methods for DNA mixtures that allow relationships between contributors.
    Green PJ; Mortera J; Prieto L
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102482. PubMed ID: 33640736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
    Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Using the Nondonor Distribution to Improve Communication and Inform Decision Making for Low LRs from Minor Contributors in Mixed DNA Profiles.
    Schuerman C; Kalafut T; Buchanan C; Sutton J; Bright JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1072-1084. PubMed ID: 32134501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The paradigm shift in DNA profile interpretation.
    Bright JA; Taylor D; Gittelson S; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Nov; 31():e24-e32. PubMed ID: 28838643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Using big data from probabilistic genotyping to solve crime.
    Taylor D; Abarno D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Mar; 57():102631. PubMed ID: 34861631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An examination of STR nomenclatures, filters and models for MPS mixture interpretation.
    Bleka Ø; Just R; Le J; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102319. PubMed ID: 32563046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Are low LRs reliable?
    Buckleton JS; Pugh SN; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Curran JM; Kruijver M; Gill P; Budowle B; Cheng K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Nov; 49():102350. PubMed ID: 32979624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Estimating the number of contributors to a DNA profile using decision trees.
    Kruijver M; Kelly H; Cheng K; Lin MH; Morawitz J; Russell L; Buckleton J; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102407. PubMed ID: 33197741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. DNA mixtures interpretation - A proof-of-concept multi-software comparison highlighting different probabilistic methods' performances on challenging samples.
    Alladio E; Omedei M; Cisana S; D'Amico G; Caneparo D; Vincenti M; Garofano P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Nov; 37():143-150. PubMed ID: 30173123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Investigation into the effect of mixtures comprising related people on non-donor likelihood ratios, and potential practises to mitigate providing misleading opinions.
    Kalafut T; Bright JA; Taylor D; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102691. PubMed ID: 35390645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. RFU derived LRs for activity level assignments using Bayesian Networks.
    Gill P; Bleka Ø; Fonneløp AE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jan; 56():102608. PubMed ID: 34735938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The analogy between DNA kinship and DNA mixture evaluation, with applications for the interpretation of likelihood ratios produced by possibly imperfect models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102449. PubMed ID: 33517022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Interpreting a major component from a mixed DNA profile with an unknown number of minor contributors.
    Bille T; Weitz S; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():150-159. PubMed ID: 30844683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Likelihood ratio development for mixed Y-STR profiles.
    Taylor D; Curran J; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():82-96. PubMed ID: 29679928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. How many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are needed to replace short tandem repeats (STRs) in forensic applications?
    Lee HJ; Lee JW; Jeong SJ; Park M
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Sep; 131(5):1203-1210. PubMed ID: 28243773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples.
    Costa C; Figueiredo C; Amorim A; Costa S; Ferreira PM; Pinto N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102715. PubMed ID: 35490558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A mixed DNA profile controversy revisited.
    Kalafut T; Pugh S; Gill P; Abbas S; Semaan M; Mansour I; Curran J; Bright JA; Hicks T; Wivell R; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jan; 67(1):128-135. PubMed ID: 34651300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
    Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.