These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35460026)

  • 1. Relative, not absolute, stimulus size is responsible for a correspondence effect between physical stimulus size and left/right responses.
    Wühr P; Richter M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1342-1358. PubMed ID: 35460026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?
    Lien MC; Pedersen L; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):912-934. PubMed ID: 26318437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS; Ortiz TA
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3705-13. PubMed ID: 8985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus-response compatibility for absolute and relative spatial correspondence in reaching and in button pressing.
    Stins JF; Michaels CF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):569-89. PubMed ID: 10881619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory stimulus-response compatibility: is there a contribution of stimulus-hand correspondence?
    Roswarski TE; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2000; 63(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 10946588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Associations between physical size and space are strongly asymmetrical.
    Richter M; Wühr P
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):16256. PubMed ID: 37759068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Nature of Associations between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-Right Response Codes.
    Richter M; Wühr P
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):15. PubMed ID: 36072110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Iacoboni M; Woods RP; Mazziotta JC
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 76(1):321-31. PubMed ID: 8836228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of irrelevant response dimension on stimulus response compatibility.
    Shi K; Wang L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Mar; 223():103495. PubMed ID: 34999352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flowers and spiders in spatial stimulus-response compatibility: does affective valence influence selection of task-sets or selection of responses?
    Yamaguchi M; Chen J; Mishler S; Proctor RW
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1003-1017. PubMed ID: 28946804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critical bottom-up attentional factors in the handle orientation effect: asymmetric luminance transients and object-center eccentricity relative to fixation.
    Kostov K; Janyan A
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1685-1705. PubMed ID: 32248290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compatibility between Physical Stimulus Size and Left-right Responses: Small is Left and Large is Right.
    Wühr P; Seegelke C
    J Cogn; 2018 Feb; 1(1):17. PubMed ID: 31517191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect.
    Roswarski TE; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2003 Feb; 67(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 12589449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring handedness asymmetries in the Simon effect.
    Seibold JC; Chen J; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):437-51. PubMed ID: 26676871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemispheric sensitivity to body stimuli in simple reaction time.
    Aziz-Zadeh L; Iacoboni M; Zaidel E
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 170(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 16328286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Simon effect for stimulus-response duration.
    Kunde W; Stöcker C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):581-92. PubMed ID: 12047060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus-response compatibilities between vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: the effects of hand position and posture.
    Michaels CF; Schilder S
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Apr; 49(4):342-8. PubMed ID: 2030931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of acute experimental hand pain on left-right discrimination response latency for hand recognition.
    Phillips N; Hach S; Mannion J; Moran R
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2020 Nov; 36(11):1232-1240. PubMed ID: 30724639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compatibility effects with touchless gestures.
    Janczyk M
    Exp Brain Res; 2023 Mar; 241(3):743-752. PubMed ID: 36720746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Representing response position relative to display location: influence on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jul; 58(5):839-64. PubMed ID: 16194938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.