These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35460026)

  • 21. Influences of response position and hand posture on the orthogonal Simon effect.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Jul; 61(7):1020-35. PubMed ID: 18938283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects?
    Proctor RW; Lien MC; Thompson L
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():91-101. PubMed ID: 28865287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Representing response position relative to display location: influence on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jul; 58(5):839-64. PubMed ID: 16194938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stimulus-response compatibility for vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: evidence for spatial coding.
    Weeks DJ; Proctor RW; Beyak B
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 May; 48(2):367-83. PubMed ID: 7610272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influences of hand posture and hand position on compatibility effects for up-down stimuli mapped to left-right responses: evidence for a hand referent hypothesis.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Nov; 64(8):1301-15. PubMed ID: 12519027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Role of hand dominance in mapping preferences for emotional-valence words to keypress responses.
    Song X; Chen J; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Oct; 180():33-39. PubMed ID: 28823632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Compatibility effects with touchless gestures.
    Janczyk M
    Exp Brain Res; 2023 Mar; 241(3):743-752. PubMed ID: 36720746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spatial compatibility effects with tool use.
    Kunde W; Müsselar J; Heuer H
    Hum Factors; 2007 Aug; 49(4):661-70. PubMed ID: 17702217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influences of multiple spatial stimulus and response codes on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Aug; 66(6):1003-17. PubMed ID: 15675647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.
    Friedgen E; Koch I; Stephan DN
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1546-1562. PubMed ID: 35103924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Handedness and effector strength modulate a compatibility effect between stimulus size and response position with manual and vocal responses.
    Wühr P; Richter M; Seegelke C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Mar; 50(3):263-279. PubMed ID: 38421774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.
    Couth S; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 24337351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding.
    Hommel B; Lippa Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1995 Sep; 2(3):370-4. PubMed ID: 24203717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The prominent role of perceptual salience in object discrimination: overt discrimination of graspable side does not activate grasping affordances.
    Pellicano A; Binkofski F
    Psychol Res; 2021 Apr; 85(3):1234-1247. PubMed ID: 32036443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. When left feels right: asymmetry in the affordance effect.
    Janyan A; Slavcheva GV
    Cogn Process; 2012 Aug; 13 Suppl 1():S199-202. PubMed ID: 22806648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of irrelevant stimulus orientation on visually guided grasping movements.
    Wühr P; Elsner B
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 121(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 17469919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Display-control arrangement correspondence and logical recoding in the Hedge and Marsh reversal of the Simon effect.
    Proctor RW; F Pick D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Mar; 112(3):259-78. PubMed ID: 12595150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The unimanual handle-to-hand correspondence effect: evidence for a location coding account.
    Pellicano A; Lugli L; Binkofski F; Rubichi S; Iani C; Nicoletti R
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1383-1399. PubMed ID: 29651534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mixing location-irrelevant and location-relevant trials: influence of stimulus mode on spatial compatibility effects.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Mar; 30(2):281-93. PubMed ID: 12035890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.