These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35460026)

  • 41. Visual field x response hand interactions and level priming in the processing of laterally presented hierarchical stimuli.
    Wendt M; Vietze I; Kluwe RH
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Feb; 63(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 16901597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Response-specifying cue for action interferes with perception of feature-sharing stimuli.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jun; 63(6):1150-67. PubMed ID: 20509179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effector identity and orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility in blindness to response-compatible stimuli.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Psychol Res; 2010 Mar; 74(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 19214563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Stimulus-response compatibility with body parts: a study with hands.
    Lameira AP; Pereira A; Fraga-Filho RS; Gawryszewski LG
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2127-32. PubMed ID: 25893910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Neglect determined by the relative location of responses.
    Làdavas E; Farnè A; Carletti M; Zeloni G
    Brain; 1994 Aug; 117 ( Pt 4)():705-14. PubMed ID: 7922458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Stimulus-response compatibility and position of the hands: nonadditive effects.
    Ghozlan A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Jun; 86(3 Pt 1):843-50. PubMed ID: 9656279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Are crossmodal correspondences relative or absolute? Sequential effects on speeded classification.
    Brunetti R; Indraccolo A; Del Gatto C; Spence C; Santangelo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):527-534. PubMed ID: 29116614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Compatibility between response position and either object typical size or semantic category: SNARC- and MARC-like effects in primary school children.
    Uccula A; Enna M; Treccani B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Jan; 189():104682. PubMed ID: 31563710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Transfer of incompatible spatial mapping to the vertical Simon task generalizes across effectors but not stimulus features.
    Zhong Q; Proctor RW; Xiong A; Vu KL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):1-11. PubMed ID: 32140934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects emerge even when the stimulus position is task irrelevant.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jun; 59(6):1021-32. PubMed ID: 16885141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli.
    Mattson PS; Fournier LR
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1236-47. PubMed ID: 18927040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Space and Motion Stimulus-Response Correspondence (SRC) Effects in a Single Task.
    Styrkowiec P
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Sep; 63(5):297-306. PubMed ID: 27832733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Task Dominance Determines Backward Inhibition in Task Switching.
    Jost K; Hennecke V; Koch I
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():755. PubMed ID: 28539907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Eyes versus hands: How perceived stimuli influence motor actions.
    Geiger A; Niessen E; Bente G; Vogeley K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180780. PubMed ID: 28746352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Pointing hand stimuli induce spatial compatibility effects and effector priming.
    Nishimura A; Michimata C
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():219. PubMed ID: 23637688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Simon task with multi-component responses: two loci of response-effect compatibility.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2011 May; 75(3):214-26. PubMed ID: 20625765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Control-display alignment determines the prevalent compatibility effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response tasks.
    Lee S; Miles JD; Vu KP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 26169949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Cross-sensory mapping of feature values in the size-brightness correspondence can be more relative than absolute.
    Walker L; Walker P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jan; 42(1):138-50. PubMed ID: 26322684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.