BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35460722)

  • 1. Women with obesity participate less in cervical cancer screening and are more likely to have unsatisfactory smears: Results from a nationwide Danish cohort study.
    Urbute A; Kjaer SK; Kesmodel US; Frederiksen K; Thomsen LT
    Prev Med; 2022 Jun; 159():107072. PubMed ID: 35460722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overweight and obesity as risk factors for cervical cancer and detection of precancers among screened women: A nationwide, population-based cohort study.
    Urbute A; Frederiksen K; Thomsen LT; Kesmodel US; Kjaer SK
    Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Feb; 181():20-27. PubMed ID: 38103421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening participation after a false positive result in organized cervical cancer screening: a nationwide register-based cohort study.
    Larsen PT; Jørgensen SF; Tranberg M; Njor SH
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15427. PubMed ID: 32963299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of cervical cancer following negative smears in Maribo County, Denmark, 1966-1982.
    Lynge E; Poll P
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):69-86. PubMed ID: 3570417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of overweight and obesity on participation in cervical cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sand FL; Urbute A; Ring LL; Kjaer AK; Belmonte F; Kjaer SK
    Prev Med; 2023 Jul; 172():107519. PubMed ID: 37080502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of cervical screening after age 60 years according to screening history: Nationwide cohort study in Sweden.
    Wang J; Andrae B; Sundström K; Ploner A; Ström P; Elfström KM; Dillner J; Sparén P
    PLoS Med; 2017 Oct; 14(10):e1002414. PubMed ID: 29065127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of an organized cervical cancer screening program in Korea: results from a cohort study.
    Jun JK; Choi KS; Jung KW; Lee HY; Gapstur SM; Park EC; Yoo KY
    Int J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 124(1):188-93. PubMed ID: 18785204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incidence of cervical cancer following negative smear. A cohort study from Maribo County, Denmark.
    Lynge E; Poll P
    Am J Epidemiol; 1986 Sep; 124(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 3740035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors associated with non-participation in cervical cancer screening - A nationwide study of nearly half a million women in Denmark.
    Harder E; Juul KE; Jensen SM; Thomsen LT; Frederiksen K; Kjaer SK
    Prev Med; 2018 Jun; 111():94-100. PubMed ID: 29501474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence: Effect of Low Body Mass Index in Women.
    Charkhchi P; Schabath MB; Carlos RC
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2020 Jul; 29(7):996-1006. PubMed ID: 31928405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-participation in cervical cancer screening according to health, lifestyle and sexual behavior: A population-based study of nearly 15,000 Danish women aged 23-45 years.
    Harder E; Hertzum-Larsen R; Frederiksen K; Kjær SK; Thomsen LT
    Prev Med; 2020 Aug; 137():106119. PubMed ID: 32387298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-participation in screening: the case of cervical cancer in Denmark.
    Dugué PA; Lynge E; Bjerregaard B; Rebolj M
    Prev Med; 2012; 54(3-4):266-9. PubMed ID: 22300964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predictors of an unsatisfactory conventional cervical cytology smear.
    Paulin H; Geldenhuys L; Naugler C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):725-728. PubMed ID: 21749749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk factors for cervical neoplasia in Denmark.
    Kjaer SK
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 80():1-41. PubMed ID: 9693662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patterns of gynaecological check-up and their association with body mass index within the CONSTANCES cohort.
    Franck JE; Ringa V; Rigal L; Sassenou J; Cœuret-Pellicer M; Chauvin P; Menvielle G
    J Med Screen; 2021 Mar; 28(1):10-17. PubMed ID: 32279590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast and cervical cancer screening in obese minority women.
    Ferrante JM; Chen PH; Jacobs A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2006 Jun; 15(5):531-41. PubMed ID: 16796480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Participation in cervical cancer screening among immigrants and Danish-born women in Denmark.
    Hertzum-Larsen R; Kjær SK; Frederiksen K; Thomsen LT
    Prev Med; 2019 Jun; 123():55-64. PubMed ID: 30796926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early detection of precursors of cervical cancer with cervical cytology and visual inspection of cervix with acetic Acid.
    Dhaubhadel P; Vaidya A; Choudhary P
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(170):71-6. PubMed ID: 18709035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association between obesity and abnormal Papanicolau(Pap) smear cytology results in a resource-poor Nigerian setting.
    Okoro SO; Ajah LO; Nkwo PO; Aniebue UU; Ozumba BC; Chigbu CO
    BMC Womens Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):119. PubMed ID: 32517800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.