447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35460866)
1. Error propagation from intraoral scanning to additive manufacturing of complete-arch dentate models: An in vitro study.
Auškalnis L; Akulauskas M; Jegelevičius D; Simonaitis T; Rutkūnas V
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104136. PubMed ID: 35460866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trueness of Crown Preparation Dies in Dental Models: An In Vitro Assessment of Digital and Analog Workflows.
Auskalnis L; Akulauskas M; Jegelevicius D; Rutkunas V
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(7):89-98. PubMed ID: 38498861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Positional trueness of abutments by using a digital die-merging protocol compared with complete arch direct digital scans and conventional dental impressions.
Jelicich A; Scialabba R; Lee SJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 35430047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study.
Vag J; Stevens CD; Badahman MH; Ludlow M; Sharp M; Brenes C; Mennito A; Renne W
J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
Ender A; Mehl A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trueness of maxillomandibular relationship in 3D-printed and conventional casts.
Auškalnis L; Akulauskas M; Osnes C; Revilla-León M; Kernen-Gintautė A; Rutkūnas V
J Dent; 2024 May; ():105044. PubMed ID: 38710316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner.
Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study.
Ke Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun Y
J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104561. PubMed ID: 37236297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of Complete-Arch Implant Digital Scans: Effect of Scanning Protocol, Number of Implants, and Scan Body Splinting.
Denneulin T; Rignon-Bret C; Ravalec G; Tapie L; Bouter D; Wulfman C
Int J Prosthodont; 2023 May; 36(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 36288490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro comparison of five desktop scanners and an industrial scanner in the evaluation of an intraoral scanner accuracy.
Borbola D; Berkei G; Simon B; Romanszky L; Sersli G; DeFee M; Renne W; Mangano F; Vag J
J Dent; 2023 Feb; 129():104391. PubMed ID: 36549570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
Diker B; Tak Ö
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of full-arch digitalization for partially edentulous jaws - a laboratory study on basis of coordinate-based data analysis.
Kontis P; Güth JF; Keul C
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Apr; 26(4):3651-3662. PubMed ID: 34981252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Accuracy of Full-Arch Intraoral Optical Impressions (IOS): Clinical Pilot Study of the Influence of the Scan Strategy, Operator, and Intraoral Scanner.
Cordaro M; Sailer I; Zarauz C; Liu X; Karasan D
Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 36(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 38109389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of intraoral digital impressions for obtaining gingival contour in the esthetic zone: accuracy outcomes.
Wei D; Di P; Tian J; Zhao Y; Lin Y
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Apr; 24(4):1401-1410. PubMed ID: 31754870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in vitro.
Zimmermann M; Ender A; Mehl A
J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Feb; 151(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 31883705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the Effect of Ambient and Scanning Lights on the Trueness of the Intraoral Scanner.
Koseoglu M; Kahramanoglu E; Akin H
J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):811-816. PubMed ID: 33533100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
