These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3546091)

  • 1. Classifier-directed signal processing in brain research.
    Gevins AS; Morgan NH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1986 Dec; 33(12):1054-68. PubMed ID: 3546091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Classification and detection of single evoked brain potentials using time-frequency amplitude features.
    Moser JM; Aunon JI
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1986 Dec; 33(12):1096-106. PubMed ID: 3817840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multichannel, single trial event related potential classification.
    Childers DG; Fischler IS; Boaz TL; Perry NW; Arroyo AA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1986 Dec; 33(12):1069-75. PubMed ID: 3817837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. xDAWN algorithm to enhance evoked potentials: application to brain-computer interface.
    Rivet B; Souloumiac A; Attina V; Gibert G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Aug; 56(8):2035-43. PubMed ID: 19174332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Neural engineering and neural prostheses].
    Gao SK; Zhang ZG; Gao XR; Hong B; Yang FS
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 30(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 16830794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The algorithms and development for the extraction of evoked potentials].
    Niu J; Qiu T
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Jun; 21(3):486-9. PubMed ID: 15250163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A survey of signal processing algorithms in brain-computer interfaces based on electrical brain signals.
    Bashashati A; Fatourechi M; Ward RK; Birch GE
    J Neural Eng; 2007 Jun; 4(2):R32-57. PubMed ID: 17409474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The computer analysis of the EEG and EP: the problems and solutions].
    Kulaichev AP
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1995; 45(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 7645339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A parametric method of identification of single-trial event-related potentials in the brain.
    Cerutti S; Chiarenza G; Liberati D; Mascellani P; Pavesi G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1988 Sep; 35(9):701-11. PubMed ID: 3169822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [EEG monitoring for quantifying the "depth of anesthesia": possibilities and limits].
    Schüttler J
    Klin Anasthesiol Intensivther; 1994; 46():306-18. PubMed ID: 8065106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brain interface research for asynchronous control applications.
    Borisoff JF; Mason SG; Birch GE
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Jun; 14(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 16792283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Representation strategies with reference to the classification of EEG variables].
    Pöppl SJ
    Methods Inf Med Suppl; 1976; 9():403-30. PubMed ID: 1078452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A maximum likelihood method for estimating EEG evoked potentials.
    al-Nashi H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1986 Dec; 33(12):1087-95. PubMed ID: 3817839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technology and equipment review. Evoked potential instrumentation, Part II.
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Apr; 10(2):246-52. PubMed ID: 8505416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Advance in brain-computer interface technology].
    Yang K; Tian M; Zhang H; Zhao Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Dec; 21(6):1024-7. PubMed ID: 15646357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contemporary trends in neurometric waveform analysis: introduction.
    Samar VJ; Molfese DL
    Brain Cogn; 1995 Apr; 27(3):253-5. PubMed ID: 7626276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of movement-related desynchronization patterns in ongoing single-channel electrocorticogram.
    Graimann B; Huggins JE; Schlögl A; Levine SP; Pfurtscheller G
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 14518791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robust classification of EEG signal for brain-computer interface.
    Thulasidas M; Guan C; Wu J
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Mar; 14(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 16562628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of linear, nonlinear, and feature selection methods for EEG signal classification.
    Garrett D; Peterson DA; Anderson CW; Thaut MH
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Jun; 11(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 12899257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The use of anticipatory averaging in the study of evoked brain potentials].
    Shugurov OO; Shugurov OA
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2006; 32(5):132-5. PubMed ID: 17100351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.