BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35461481)

  • 1. Identifying and overcoming limitations with in situ calibration beads for quantitative ultrasound.
    Cario J; Coila A; Zhao Y; Miller RJ; L Oelze M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Apr; 151(4):2701. PubMed ID: 35461481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of Backscatter Coefficients Using an In Situ Calibration Source.
    Nguyen TN; Tam AJ; Do MN; Oelze ML
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Feb; 67(2):308-317. PubMed ID: 31567079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3.
    Zhao Y; Czarnota GJ; Park TH; Miller RJ; Oelze ML
    bioRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38370712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation in nonlinear regime using an in situ calibration target.
    Coila A; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jun; 151(6):4196. PubMed ID: 35778186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Absolute backscatter coefficient estimates of tissue-mimicking phantoms in the 5-50 MHz frequency range.
    McCormick MM; Madsen EL; Deaner ME; Varghese T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):737-43. PubMed ID: 21877789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Normalization and backscatter spectral analysis of human carotid arterial data acquired using a clinical linear array ultrasound imaging system.
    Sareen M; Waters K; Nair A; Vince DG
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():2968-71. PubMed ID: 19163329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calibration and Evaluation of Ultrasound Thermography UsingĀ Infrared Imaging.
    Hsiao YS; Deng CX
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):503-17. PubMed ID: 26547634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface refraction of sound waves affects calibration of three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Ballhausen H; Ballhausen BD; Lachaine M; Li M; Parodi K; Belka C; Reiner M
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 May; 10():119. PubMed ID: 26014494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power Spectrum Consistency among Systems and Transducers.
    Guerrero QW; Fan L; Brunke S; Milkowski A; Rosado-Mendez IM; Hall TJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 44(11):2358-2370. PubMed ID: 30093341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative Ultrasound: Experimental Implementation.
    Oelze M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2023; 1403():29-42. PubMed ID: 37495913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Active echo: a new paradigm for ultrasound calibration.
    Guo X; Cheng A; Zhang HK; Kang HJ; Etienne-Cummings R; Boctor EM
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2014; 17(Pt 2):397-404. PubMed ID: 25485404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimates in layered tissue-mimicking phantoms among three clinical scanners.
    Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Madsen EL; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Oct; 34(4):209-21. PubMed ID: 23160474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A phantom with reduced complexity for spatial 3-D ultrasound calibration.
    Dandekar S; Li Y; Molloy J; Hossack J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1083-93. PubMed ID: 16085099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method for estimating an overlying layer correction in quantitative ultrasound imaging.
    Lu ZF; Zagzebski JA; Madsen EL; Dong F
    Ultrason Imaging; 1995 Oct; 17(4):269-90. PubMed ID: 8677562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the total ultrasound attenuation along the propagation path by using a reference phantom.
    Labyed Y; Bigelow TA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3232-8. PubMed ID: 21110618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation.
    Coila A; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):85. PubMed ID: 31370607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the statistics of quantitative ultrasound techniques with deformation compounding: an experimental study.
    Herd MT; Hall TJ; Jiang J; Zagzebski JA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2066-74. PubMed ID: 22033132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An ionizing radiation acoustic imaging (iRAI) technique for real-time dosimetric measurements for FLASH radiotherapy.
    Oraiqat I; Zhang W; Litzenberg D; Lam K; Ba Sunbul N; Moran J; Cuneo K; Carson P; Wang X; El Naqa I
    Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):5090-5101. PubMed ID: 32592212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beam calibration without a phantom for creating a 3-D freehand ultrasound system.
    Muratore DM; Galloway RL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 27(11):1557-66. PubMed ID: 11750755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
    Liu W; Zagzebski JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.