BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35461481)

  • 21. Backscatter coefficient estimation using tapers with gaps.
    Luchies AC; Oelze ML
    Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Apr; 37(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 25189857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of freehand 3-D ultrasound calibration techniques using a stylus.
    Hsu PW; Treece GM; Prager RW; Houghton NE; Gee AH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1610-21. PubMed ID: 18420335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Automatic spatial calibration of freehand ultrasound probe with a multilayer N-wire phantom.
    Wu C; Fu T; Chen X; Xiao J; Ai D; Fan J; Lin Y; Song H; Yang J
    Ultrasonics; 2023 Feb; 128():106862. PubMed ID: 36240539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Real-time freehand 3D ultrasound calibration.
    Hsu PW; Prager RW; Gee AH; Treece GM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 34(2):239-51. PubMed ID: 17935870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Determining temperature distribution in tissue in the focal plane of the high (>100 W/cm(2)) intensity focused ultrasound beam using phase shift of ultrasound echoes.
    Karwat P; Kujawska T; Lewin PA; Secomski W; Gambin B; Litniewski J
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():211-9. PubMed ID: 26498063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. 3-D Freehand Ultrasound Calibration Using a Tissue-Mimicking Phantom With Parallel Wires.
    Marcadent S; Heches J; Favre J; Desseauve D; Thiran JP
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Jan; 49(1):165-177. PubMed ID: 36257837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hybrid spectral domain method for attenuation slope estimation.
    Kim H; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1808-19. PubMed ID: 18621468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Geometry calibration method for a cone-beam CT system.
    Yang H; Kang K; Xing Y
    Med Phys; 2017 May; 44(5):1692-1706. PubMed ID: 28206667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On the estimation of backscatter coefficients using single-element focused transducers.
    Lavarello RJ; Ghoshal G; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):2903-11. PubMed ID: 21568393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative ultrasound imaging: in vivo results in normal liver.
    Zagzebski JA; Lu ZF; Yao LX
    Ultrason Imaging; 1993 Oct; 15(4):335-51. PubMed ID: 8171756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Methods for quantifying ultrasound backscatter and two-dimensional video intensity: implications for contrast-enhanced sonography.
    Schwarz KQ; Chen X; Steinmetz S
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1998 Feb; 11(2):155-68. PubMed ID: 9517555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative sub-resolution blood velocity estimation using ultrasound localization microscopy ex-vivo and in-vivo.
    EspĂ­ndola D; DeRuiter RM; Santibanez F; Dayton PA; Pinton G
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Apr; 6(3):035019. PubMed ID: 33438664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cross-imaging system comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates from a tissue-mimicking material.
    Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Oelze ML; Lavarello RJ; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1319-24. PubMed ID: 22978860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. NIST/ISAC standardization study: variability in assignment of intensity values to fluorescence standard beads and in cross calibration of standard beads to hard dyed beads.
    Hoffman RA; Wang L; Bigos M; Nolan JP
    Cytometry A; 2012 Sep; 81(9):785-96. PubMed ID: 22915363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of calibration methods for spatial tracking of a 3-D ultrasound probe.
    Poon TC; Rohling RN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1095-108. PubMed ID: 16085100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating the total ultrasound attenuation along the propagation path by applying multiple filters to backscattered echoes from a single spherically focused source.
    Bigelow T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Apr; 57(4):900-7. PubMed ID: 20378452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Amplitude based segmentation of ultrasound echoes for attenuation coefficient estimation.
    Civale J; Bamber J; Harris E
    Ultrasonics; 2021 Mar; 111():106302. PubMed ID: 33264741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Simultaneous backscatter and attenuation estimation using a least squares method with constraints.
    Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2096-104. PubMed ID: 21963038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Techniques and evaluation from a cross-platform imaging comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters in an in vivo rodent fibroadenoma model.
    Wirtzfeld LA; Nam K; Labyed Y; Ghoshal G; Haak A; Sen-Gupta E; He Z; Hirtz NR; Miller RJ; Sarwate S; Simpson DG; Zagzebski JA; Bigelow TA; Oelze M; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jul; 60(7):1386-400. PubMed ID: 25004506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accurate proton treatment planning for pencil beam crossing titanium fixation implants.
    Righetto R; Clemens LP; Lorentini S; Fracchiolla F; Algranati C; Tommasino F; Dionisi F; Cianchetti M; Schwarz M; Farace P
    Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():28-38. PubMed ID: 31954210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.