484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35461973)
1. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners.
Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Sep; 124(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 31864638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner.
Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of color temperature and illuminance of ambient light conditions on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans.
Ochoa-López G; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38014704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of splinting scan bodies on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 different intraoral scanners.
Azevedo L; Marques T; Karasan D; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Correia A; Gómez-Polo M
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):204-210. PubMed ID: 37537105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy assessment (trueness and precision) of a confocal based intraoral scanner under twelve different ambient lighting conditions.
Piedra-Cascón W; Adhikari RR; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR; Revilla-León M; Gallas-Torreira M
J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104530. PubMed ID: 37116740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
Diker B; Tak Ö
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of scan powder and scanning technology on measured deviations of complete-arch implant supported frameworks digitized with industrial and intraoral scanners.
Donmez MB; Çakmak G; Dede DÖ; Küçükekenci AS; Lu WE; Schumacher FL; Revilla-León M; Yilmaz B
J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104736. PubMed ID: 37802291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study.
Vag J; Stevens CD; Badahman MH; Ludlow M; Sharp M; Brenes C; Mennito A; Renne W
J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of the ambient color lighting on the accuracy of complete arch implant scans recorded by using two intraoral scanners.
Ochoa-López G; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38653690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of Different Illuminance of the Room Lighting Condition on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of An Intraoral Scanner.
Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Att W; Krishnamurthy VR
J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):157-162. PubMed ID: 33094878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does ambient light affect the accuracy and scanning time of intraoral scans?
Wesemann C; Kienbaum H; Thun M; Spies BC; Beuer F; Bumann A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):924-931. PubMed ID: 32487348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of scan technology on the accuracy and speed of intraoral scanning systems for the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study.
Osman RB; Alharbi NM
J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(9):821-828. PubMed ID: 36571837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study.
Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of intraoral scanner and fixed partial denture situation on the scan accuracy of multiple implants: An in vitro study.
Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 25(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 36762495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners.
Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of additional reference objects on accuracy of five intraoral scanners in partially and completely edentulous jaws: An in vitro study.
Rutkūnas V; Gedrimienė A; Al-Haj Husain N; Pletkus J; Barauskis D; Jegelevičius D; Özcan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 34799084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
