These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35461973)

  • 21. Accuracy of four recent intraoral scanners with respect to two different ceramic surfaces.
    Yatmaz BB; Raith S; Reich S
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104414. PubMed ID: 36640842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intraoral Scans of Full Dental Arches: An In Vitro Measurement Study of the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners.
    Giuliodori G; Rappelli G; Aquilanti L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 36981684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
    Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of pulp chamber depth on the accuracy of endocrown scans made with different intraoral scanners versus an industrial scanner: An in vitro study.
    Gurpinar B; Tak O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):430-437. PubMed ID: 33309210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Cascos-Sánchez R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104431. PubMed ID: 36682722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of conventional impressions and digital scans for implant-supported fixed prostheses in maxillary free-ended partial edentulism: An in vitro study.
    El Osta N; Drancourt N; Auduc C; Veyrune JL; Nicolas E
    J Dent; 2024 Apr; 143():104892. PubMed ID: 38367825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Trueness and precision of mandibular complete-arch implant scans when different data acquisition methods are used.
    Demirel M; Donmez MB; Şahmalı SM
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104700. PubMed ID: 37714451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of Scanner Type and Scan Body Location on the Accuracy of Mandibular Complete-Arch Digital Implant Scans: An In Vitro Study.
    Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Treviño Santos A; Kökat AM; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):419-426. PubMed ID: 34453466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy.
    Revilla-León M; Gohil A; Barmak AB; Gómez-Polo M; Pérez-Barquero JA; Att W; Kois JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):755-760. PubMed ID: 35210107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of a chairside reverse scanbody workflow for a complete arch implant-supported prosthesis using four intraoral scanners versus a desktop scanner.
    Nuytens P; Vandeweghe S; D'haese R
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104717. PubMed ID: 37739058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Positional trueness of abutments by using a digital die-merging protocol compared with complete arch direct digital scans and conventional dental impressions.
    Jelicich A; Scialabba R; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 35430047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of different intraoral scanners and scanbody splinting on accuracy of scanning implant-supported full arch fixed prosthesis.
    Ashraf Y; Abo El Fadl A; Hamdy A; Ebeid K
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Dec; 35(8):1257-1263. PubMed ID: 37310208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Impact of the superimposition reference area on intraoral scanning accuracy in a partially dentate maxilla.
    Negm EE; Patel M; Ryan P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):189.e1-189.e11. PubMed ID: 38556406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions: an in vitro study.
    Passos L; Meiga S; Brigagão V; Street A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(4):307-319. PubMed ID: 31840139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the accuracy of seven intraoral scanners for the full dentate and partially edentulous complete-arch mandibular casts: An
    Wang X; Zhang F; Ma D; Ye X; Zheng X; Ren R; Ren N; Bai S
    Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e31063. PubMed ID: 38803930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship at centric relation position recorded by using 3 different intraoral scanners with or without an optical jaw tracking system: An in vivo pilot study.
    Revilla-León M; Fernández-Estevan L; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Pérez-Barquero JA
    J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104478. PubMed ID: 36889536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intraoral digital scans: Part 2-influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the mesh quality of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Jiang P; Sadeghpour M; Piedra-Cascón W; Zandinejad A; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):575-580. PubMed ID: 31870612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vivo trueness and precision of full-arch implant scans using intraoral scanners with three different acquisition protocols.
    Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Thulin M; Nyström I; Thor A
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104308. PubMed ID: 36481688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of different material substrates on the accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Lampropoulos P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):82–93. PubMed ID: 33751003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.