These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35461994)
1. Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Patients. Clothier W; Treffalls JA; Tolbert PH; Harbin Z; Yan Q; Davies MG Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 85():96-104. PubMed ID: 35461994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins. Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality Analysis of Online Resources for Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease. Treffalls JA; Treffalls RN; Zachary H; Clothier W; Tolbert PH; Yan Q; Davies MG Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Jul; 83():1-9. PubMed ID: 34995744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability. Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality analysis of publicly available information about hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Brennan Z; Sharaf OM; Treffalls JA; Roa-Vidal N; Weinstein DJ; Bassuk JS; Stukov Y; Peek GJ; Bleiweis MS; Jacobs JP Cardiol Young; 2023 Jul; 33(7):1079-1085. PubMed ID: 37605817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources. Kong KA; Hu A Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma. Martin CA; Khan S; Lee R; Do AT; Sridhar J; Crowell EL; Bowden EC Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(5):525-530. PubMed ID: 35301989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Bilingual Readability Assessment of Online Breast Cancer Screening and Treatment Information. Tabla Cendra D; Gao TP; HoSang KM; Gao TJ; Wu J; Pronovost MT; Williams AD; Kuo LE J Surg Res; 2024 Oct; 302():200-207. PubMed ID: 39098118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of the Patient Information Quality and Readability on Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the Internet. Priyanka P; Hadi YB; Reynolds GJ Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018; 2018():2849390. PubMed ID: 30510923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality and Readability of Web-based Arabic Health Information on Denture Hygiene: An Infodemiology Study. Alhajj MN; Mashyakhy M; Ariffin Z; Ab-Ghani Z; Johari Y; Salim NS J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):956-960. PubMed ID: 33568578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis. Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet. Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information. Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias. Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance. Hemaya M; Hemaya M; Habeeb A Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30758. PubMed ID: 36447695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: assessing the readability and quality of online information. Raja H; Patel K Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2023 Sep; 105(7):639-644. PubMed ID: 36374281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material. Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia. Corredera E; Davis KS; Simons JP; Jabbour N Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 29605350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Information Regarding Foreign Bodies of the Ear, Nose, and Throat: Qualitative Content Analysis. Ko TK; Tan DJY; Fan KS JMIR Form Res; 2024 Aug; 8():e55535. PubMed ID: 39145998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of Online Information for Esophageal Cancer. Parmar GS; Das S; Ingledew PA J Cancer Educ; 2023 Jun; 38(3):863-869. PubMed ID: 35854205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]