These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35462203)

  • 1. The orienting response drives pseudoneglect-Evidence from an objective pupillometric method.
    Strauch C; Romein C; Naber M; Van der Stigchel S; Ten Brink AF
    Cortex; 2022 Jun; 151():259-271. PubMed ID: 35462203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence for a common mechanism of spatial attention and visual awareness: Towards construct validity of pseudoneglect.
    Chen J; Kaur J; Abbas H; Wu M; Luo W; Osman S; Niemeier M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212998. PubMed ID: 30845258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.
    Learmonth G; Gallagher A; Gibson J; Thut G; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138379. PubMed ID: 26378925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Jewell G
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adult developmental trajectories of pseudoneglect in the tactile, visual and auditory modalities and the influence of starting position and stimulus length.
    Brooks JL; Darling S; Malvaso C; Della Sala S
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Mar; 103():12-22. PubMed ID: 26799680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space.
    Heber IA; Siebertz S; Wolter M; Kuhlen T; Fimm B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 20537456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing the activation-orientation account of spatial attentional asymmetries using transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Loftus AM; Nicholls ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Sep; 50(11):2573-6. PubMed ID: 22820341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A critical review and meta-analysis of the perceptual pseudoneglect across psychiatric disorders: is there a continuum?
    Ribolsi M; Di Lorenzo G; Lisi G; Niolu C; Siracusano A
    Cogn Process; 2015 Feb; 16(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 25377236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Trajectory of Pseudoneglect in Adults: A Systematic Review.
    Friedrich TE; Hunter PV; Elias LJ
    Neuropsychol Rev; 2018 Dec; 28(4):436-452. PubMed ID: 30460436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mapping visuospatial attention: the greyscales task in combination with repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Giglhuber K; Maurer S; Zimmer C; Meyer B; Krieg SM
    BMC Neurosci; 2018 Jul; 19(1):40. PubMed ID: 29996777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra- and inter-task reliability of spatial attention measures in healthy older adults.
    Märker G; Learmonth G; Thut G; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226424. PubMed ID: 31869372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent.
    Mitchell AG; Harris JM; Benstock SE; Ales JM
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107618. PubMed ID: 32891646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemispheric dominance for visuospatial attention does not predict the direction of pseudoneglect.
    Gerrits R; Verhelst H; Vingerhoets G
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107634. PubMed ID: 32998020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
    Sosa Y; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McCourt ME
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20566234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal.
    Thomas NA; Barone AJ; Flew AH; Nicholls MER
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():39-51. PubMed ID: 28063992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Hemispheric Distribution of α-Band EEG Activity During Orienting of Attention in Patients with Reduced Awareness of the Left Side of Space (Spatial Neglect).
    Lasaponara S; Pinto M; Aiello M; Tomaiuolo F; Doricchi F
    J Neurosci; 2019 May; 39(22):4332-4343. PubMed ID: 30902872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Olafson C
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Mar; 35(3):369-80. PubMed ID: 9051685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Upper visual field distractors preferentially bias attention to the left.
    Thomas NA; Castine BR; Loetscher T; Nicholls ME
    Cortex; 2015 Mar; 64():179-93. PubMed ID: 25437374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On line bisection: Validity and reliability of online measures of pseudoneglect.
    Mitchell AG; Kandt PO; McIntosh RD
    Laterality; 2022 Jul; 27(4):443-466. PubMed ID: 35940957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.