These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35466071)

  • 1. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones ≤2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Bosio A; Alessandria E; Dalmasso E; Agosti S; Vitiello F; Vercelli E; Bisconti A; Gontero P
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Nov; 8(6):1816-1822. PubMed ID: 35466071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of large pediatric renal pelvic stone burden more than 2 cm.
    Mohamed ER; Elmogazy HM; Zanaty AK; Elsharkawi AM; Riad AM; Badawy AA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Oct; 19(5):561.e1-561.e11. PubMed ID: 37414650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Residual Stone Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Shockwave Lithotripsy
    Danilovic A; Torricelli FCM; Marchini GS; Batagello C; Vicentini FC; Traxer O; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
    J Endourol; 2021 May; 35(5):609-614. PubMed ID: 33096975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Which is the best treatment of pediatric upper urinary tract stones among extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review.
    He Q; Xiao K; Chen Y; Liao B; Li H; Wang K
    BMC Urol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):98. PubMed ID: 31640693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy.
    Kruck S; Anastasiadis AG; Herrmann TR; Walcher U; Abdelhafez MF; Nicklas AP; Hölzle L; Schilling D; Bedke J; Stenzl A; Nagele U
    World J Urol; 2013 Dec; 31(6):1555-61. PubMed ID: 23064981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study.
    Vilches RM; Aliaga A; Reyes D; Sepulveda F; Mercado A; Moya F; Ledezma R; Hidalgo JP; Olmedo T; Marchant F
    Actas Urol Esp; 2015 May; 39(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 25435403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The best treatment approach for lower calyceal stones ≤20 mm in maximal diameter: mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery or shock wave lithotripsy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature conducted by the European Section of Uro-Technology and Young Academic Urologists.
    Kallidonis P; Adamou C; Ntasiotis P; Pietropaolo A; Somani B; Özsoy M; Liourdi D; Sarica K; Liatsikos E; Tailly T
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Dec; 73(6):711-723. PubMed ID: 34156200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones.
    Donaldson JF; Lardas M; Scrimgeour D; Stewart F; MacLennan S; Lam TB; McClinton S
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):612-6. PubMed ID: 25449204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What Is the Ideal Treatment for 20-30 mm Kidney Stones? Comparative Outcomes of 1197 Patients.
    Ibis MA; Gokce MI; Gökhan O; Karagoz MA; Yitgin Y; Babayigit M; Böyük A; Verep S; Tefik T; Kiremit MC; Senocak C; Guven S; Sarica K
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2023 Jun; 33(6):542-548. PubMed ID: 36827462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopic Treatment as Therapeutic Interventions for Stones of the Ureter (TISU): A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial.
    Dasgupta R; Cameron S; Aucott L; MacLennan G; Thomas RE; Kilonzo MM; Lam TBL; N'Dow J; Norrie J; Anson K; Burgess N; Clark CT; Keeley FX; MacLennan SJ; Starr K; McClinton S
    Eur Urol; 2021 Jul; 80(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 33810921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, Standard and Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the Management of 1-2cm Renal Stones.
    Wymer KM; Sharma V; Juvet T; Klett DE; Borah BJ; Koo K; Rivera M; Agarwal D; Humphreys MR; Potretzke AM
    Urology; 2021 Oct; 156():71-77. PubMed ID: 34274389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
    Zhang W; Zhou T; Wu T; Gao X; Peng Y; Xu C; Chen Q; Song R; Sun Y
    J Endourol; 2015 Jul; 29(7):745-59. PubMed ID: 25531986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in patients with non-lower pole kidney stones under the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Bai S; Zhan Y; Pan C; Liu G; Li J; Shan L
    Urolithiasis; 2023 Feb; 51(1):38. PubMed ID: 36795174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children.
    Barreto L; Jung JH; Abdelrahim A; Ahmed M; Dawkins GPC; Kazmierski M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 6(6):CD010784. PubMed ID: 29859007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience : A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones.
    Bozzini G; Verze P; Arcaniolo D; Dal Piaz O; Buffi NM; Guazzoni G; Provenzano M; Osmolorskij B; Sanguedolce F; Montanari E; Macchione N; Pummer K; Mirone V; De Sio M; Taverna G
    World J Urol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1967-1975. PubMed ID: 28875295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of Aspiration-Assisted Ureteral Access Sheath (ClearPETRA) in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.
    Erkoc M; Bozkurt M; Sezgin MA; Ozcan L; Can O; Danis E; Polat EC; Otunctemur A
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2024 May; 34(5):420-424. PubMed ID: 38546503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) still suitable for >1.5 cm intrarenal stones? Data analysis of 1902 SWLs.
    Azal Neto W; Morales E; Joseane Pachecco M; Pedro RN; Reis LO
    Scand J Urol; 2021 Oct; 55(5):388-393. PubMed ID: 34279162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
    Cone EB; Eisner BH; Ursiny M; Pareek G
    J Endourol; 2014 Jun; 28(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 24444144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children.
    Omran M; Sakr A; Desoky EAE; Ali MM; Abdalla MMH
    Arab J Urol; 2020 Mar; 18(2):106-111. PubMed ID: 33029415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for treatment of stone disease in horseshoe kidney patients.
    Gokce MI; Tokatli Z; Suer E; Hajiyev P; Akinci A; Esen B
    Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 27136473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.