These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35466736)

  • 1. Looking out or Looking Away?-Exploring the Impact of Driving With a Passenger on Young Drivers' Eye Glance Behavior.
    Mehrotra S; Zhang F; Roberts SC
    Hum Factors; 2023 Nov; 65(7):1306-1322. PubMed ID: 35466736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining drivers' eye glance patterns during distracted driving: Insights from scanning randomness and glance transition matrix.
    Wang Y; Bao S; Du W; Ye Z; Sayer JR
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():149-155. PubMed ID: 29203013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer passenger influences on male adolescent drivers' visual scanning behavior during simulated driving.
    Pradhan AK; Li K; Bingham CR; Simons-Morton BG; Ouimet MC; Shope JT
    J Adolesc Health; 2014 May; 54(5 Suppl):S42-9. PubMed ID: 24759440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
    Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Child passengers and driver culpability in fatal crashes by driver gender.
    Maasalo I; Lehtonen E; Pekkanen J; Summala H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 26507116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The correlation between drivers' road familiarity and glance behavior using real vehicle experimental data and mathematical models.
    Huang J; Hu Y; Hu L; Guo G; Gao K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 38709142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?
    Koppel S; Charlton J; Kopinathan C; Taranto D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1236-44. PubMed ID: 21376923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driving distracted with friends: Effect of passengers and driver distraction on young drivers' behavior.
    Zhang F; Mehrotra S; Roberts SC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105246. PubMed ID: 31421453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of male teenage passengers on male teenage drivers: findings from a driving simulator study.
    Ouimet MC; Pradhan AK; Simons-Morton BG; Divekar G; Mehranian H; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Sep; 58():132-9. PubMed ID: 23727554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Young females at risk while driving with a small child.
    Maasalo I; Lehtonen E; Summala H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Nov; 108():321-331. PubMed ID: 28942042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.
    Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():207-216. PubMed ID: 27209155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Keep your eyes on the road: young driver crash risk increases according to duration of distraction.
    Simons-Morton BG; Guo F; Klauer SG; Ehsani JP; Pradhan AK
    J Adolesc Health; 2014 May; 54(5 Suppl):S61-7. PubMed ID: 24759443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of billboards on driver visual behavior: a systematic literature review.
    Decker JS; Stannard SJ; McManus B; Wittig SM; Sisiopiku VP; Stavrinos D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():234-9. PubMed ID: 25000270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating driver eye glance behavior and secondary task engagement while using driving automation systems.
    Noble AM; Miles M; Perez MA; Guo F; Klauer SG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 151():105959. PubMed ID: 33385962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving.
    Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 36988583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationships Between Older Drivers' Cognitive Abilities as Assessed on the MoCA and Glance Patterns During Visual-Manual Radio Tuning While Driving.
    Lee J; Mehler B; Reimer B; Ebe K; Coughlin JF
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2018 Sep; 73(7):1190-1197. PubMed ID: 27698013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How dangerous is looking away from the road? Algorithms predict crash risk from glance patterns in naturalistic driving.
    Liang Y; Lee JD; Yekhshatyan L
    Hum Factors; 2012 Dec; 54(6):1104-16. PubMed ID: 23397818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting drivers' off-road glance behavior while interacting with in-vehicle voice interfaces.
    Zhang F; Roberts SC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jan; 179():106883. PubMed ID: 36356510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Secondary Behavior of Drivers on Cell Phones.
    Farmer CM; Klauer SG; McClafferty JA; Guo F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(8):801-8. PubMed ID: 25793432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.