179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35468221)
1. A nomogram for accurately predicting the pathological upgrading of prostate cancer, based on
Hu Q; Hong X; Xu L; Jia R
Prostate; 2022 Aug; 82(11):1077-1087. PubMed ID: 35468221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can
Yin H; Chen M; Qiu X; Qiu L; Gao J; Li D; Fu Y; Huang H; Guo S; Zhang Q; Ai S; Wang F; Guo H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Oct; 48(11):3693-3701. PubMed ID: 33813594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of PSMA PET/CT to predict upgrading in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for ISUP grade group 1 prostate cancer.
Esen B; Seymen H; Gurses B; Armutlu A; Koseoglu E; Tarim K; Ertoy Baydar D; Sarikaya AF; Canda AE; Balbay D; Kordan Y; Tilki D; Esen T; Demirkol MO
Prostate; 2024 Jan; 84(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 37661579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of
Scheltema MJ; Chang JI; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Nguyen QA; Ho B; Delprado W; Lee J; Thompson JE; Cusick T; Spriensma AS; Siriwardana AR; Yuen C; Kooner R; Hruby G; O'Neill G; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Nov; 124 Suppl 1():42-49. PubMed ID: 31287613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the likelihood of metastasis in prostate cancer patients undergoing Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT due to biochemical recurrence.
Coskun N; Kartal MO; Erdogan AS; Ozdemir E
Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Aug; 43(8):952-958. PubMed ID: 35661662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multicenter External Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Positive Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen/Positron Emission Tomography Scan in Patients with Prostate Cancer Recurrence.
Bianchi L; Castellucci P; Farolfi A; Droghetti M; Artigas C; Leite J; Corona P; Shagera QA; Moreira R; González C; Queiroz M; de Galiza Barbosa F; Schiavina R; Deandreis D; Fanti S; Ceci F
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Feb; 6(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 34933814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical parameters and nomograms for predicting lymph node metastasis detected with
Onal C; Ozyigit G; Oymak E; Guler OC; Hurmuz P; Tilki B; Reyhan M; Tuncel M; Akyol F
Prostate; 2021 Jul; 81(10):648-656. PubMed ID: 33949694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of
Zhang J; Shao S; Wu P; Liu D; Yang B; Han D; Li Y; Lin X; Song W; Cao M; Zhang J; Kang F; Qin W; Wang J
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Apr; 46(4):908-920. PubMed ID: 30635755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Establishment and prospective validation of an SUV
Jiao J; Kang F; Zhang J; Quan Z; Wen W; Zhao X; Ma S; Wu P; Yang F; Guo W; Yang X; Yuan J; Shi Y; Wang J; Qin W
Theranostics; 2021; 11(17):8396-8411. PubMed ID: 34373749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction nomogram for
Ceci F; Bianchi L; Borghesi M; Polverari G; Farolfi A; Briganti A; Schiavina R; Brunocilla E; Castellucci P; Fanti S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Jan; 47(1):136-146. PubMed ID: 31492993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The prognostic value of
Zheng A; Wang Z; Luo L; Chang R; Gao J; Wang B; Duan X
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1169189. PubMed ID: 37234988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and External Validation of a Novel Nomogram to Predict the Probability of Pelvic Lymph-node Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Molecular Imaging with Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography.
Vis AN; Meijer D; Roberts MJ; Siriwardana AR; Morton A; Yaxley JW; Samaratunga H; Emmett L; van de Ven PM; Heymans MW; Nieuwenhuijzen JA; van der Poel HG; Donswijk ML; Boellaard TN; Schoots IG; Stricker P; Haynes AM; Oprea-Lager DE; Coughlin GD; van Leeuwen PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):553-563. PubMed ID: 37045707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective Evaluation of
Lopci E; Lughezzani G; Castello A; Saita A; Colombo P; Hurle R; Peschechera R; Benetti A; Zandegiacomo S; Pasini L; Casale P; Pietro D; Bevilacqua G; Balzarini L; Buffi NM; Guazzoni G; Lazzeri M
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jul; 7(4):764-771. PubMed ID: 32312701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Xue AL; Kalapara AA; Ballok ZE; Levy SM; Sivaratnam D; Ryan A; Ramdave S; O'Sullivan R; Moon D; Grummet JP; Frydenberg M
J Urol; 2022 Feb; 207(2):341-349. PubMed ID: 34546815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined multiple clinical characteristics for prediction of discordance in grade and stage in prostate cancer patients undergoing systematic biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
Liu H; Tang K; Xia D; Peng E; Wang L; Chen Z
Pathol Res Pract; 2020 Nov; 216(11):153235. PubMed ID: 33035728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the value of
Luo L; Zheng A; Chang R; Li Y; Gao J; Wang Z; Duan X
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Nov; 23(1):108. PubMed ID: 37924154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Standardised uptake values as determined on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography is associated with oncological outcomes in patients with prostate cancer.
Bodar YJL; Veerman H; Meijer D; de Bie K; van Leeuwen PJ; Donswijk ML; van Moorselaar RJA; Hendrikse NH; Boellaard R; Oprea-Lager DE; Vis AN
BJU Int; 2022 Jun; 129(6):768-776. PubMed ID: 35166426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
