121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35468307)
1. Speech discrimination and word identification with a consumer-level bone-conduction headset and remote microphone for children with normal hearing.
Holland Brown T; Marriage J; Salorio-Corbetto M
Int J Audiol; 2023 Apr; 62(4):320-327. PubMed ID: 35468307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using a Bone-Conduction Headset to Improve Speech Discrimination in Children With Otitis Media With Effusion.
Holland Brown T; Salorio-Corbetto M; Gray R; James Best A; Marriage JE
Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519858303. PubMed ID: 31464177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. .Signal Transparency of Remote Microphone Technology in Pediatric Bone Conduction Device Users.
Sanchez C; Morgenstein K; Snapp H
Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(5):360-370. PubMed ID: 37271142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
Kuk F; Jackson A; Keenan D; Lau CC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of SoundBite Bone Conduction Hearing Aids on Speech Recognition and Quality of Life in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness.
Luo Q; Shen Y; Chen T; Zheng Z; Shi H; Feng Y; Chen Z
Neural Plast; 2020; 2020():4106949. PubMed ID: 32963516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of extended high frequency bandwidth in osseointegrated bone conduction device users.
Snapp HA; Kuzbyt B
Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 421():108379. PubMed ID: 34756677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge.
Weiss R; Leinung M; Baumann U; Weißgerber T; Rader T; Stöver T
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 May; 274(5):2107-2115. PubMed ID: 28032241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Benefit of Remote Microphones Using Four Wireless Protocols.
Rodemerk KS; Galster JA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):724-731. PubMed ID: 26333880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a Remote Microphone System with Tri-Microphone Beamformer.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L; Battles J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 31429403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus on speech recognition over air and bone conduction military communications headsets.
Manning C; Mermagen T; Scharine A
Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():67-75. PubMed ID: 27989949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons of performance in pediatric bone conduction implant recipients using remote microphone technology.
Snapp H; Morgenstein K; Sanchez C; Coto J; Cejas I
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 139():110444. PubMed ID: 33070059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Audiological and subjective benefit with a new adhesive bone conduction hearing aid in children with congenital unilateral microtia and atresia.
Liu Y; Zhao C; Yang J; Chen P; Gao M; Wang D; Zhao S
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Sep; 279(9):4289-4301. PubMed ID: 34816297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual Differences Offer Insight Into Clinical Recommendations for Directional and Remote Microphone Technology Use in Children.
Gustafson SJ; Ricketts TA; Picou EM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Feb; 64(2):635-650. PubMed ID: 33465321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparative Study of Audiologic Outcomes for Two Transcutaneous Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices.
Powell HR; Rolfe AM; Birman CS
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(9):1525-31. PubMed ID: 26375976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation and test-retest reliability of the IHR-McCormick Automated Toy Discrimination Test.
Summerfield Q; Palmer AR; Foster JR; Marshall DH; Twomey T
Br J Audiol; 1994 Jun; 28(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 7841901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of wireless remote microphone application on speech discrimination in noise in children with cochlear implants.
Mehrkian S; Bayat Z; Javanbakht M; Emamdjomeh H; Bakhshi E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 125():192-195. PubMed ID: 31369931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech intelligibility in noisy environments with one- and two-microphone hearing aids.
Wouters J; Litière L; van Wieringen A
Audiology; 1999; 38(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 10206518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.
Gravel JS; Fausel N; Liskow C; Chobot J
Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10037061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
