These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35468433)

  • 1. Life cycle assessment of a novel metal recovery method from co-processing of coal mine waste and low-grade printed circuit boards.
    Kouloumpis V; Yan X
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 314():115074. PubMed ID: 35468433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK.
    Jeswani HK; Azapagic A
    Waste Manag; 2016 Apr; 50():346-63. PubMed ID: 26906085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Life cycle assessment of opencast coal mine production: a case study in Yimin mining area in China.
    Zhang L; Wang J; Feng Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Mar; 25(9):8475-8486. PubMed ID: 29307072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterization of the non-metal fraction of the processed waste printed circuit boards.
    Kumar A; Holuszko ME; Janke T
    Waste Manag; 2018 May; 75():94-102. PubMed ID: 29449113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Life cycle assessment of underground coal mining in China.
    Tao M; Cheng W; Nie K; Zhang X; Cao W
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan; 805():150231. PubMed ID: 34530352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Environmental and economic performance analysis of recycling waste printed circuit boards using life cycle assessment.
    Pokhrel P; Lin SL; Tsai CT
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Dec; 276():111276. PubMed ID: 32871467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors influencing the life cycle burdens of the recovery of energy from residual municipal waste.
    Burnley S; Coleman T; Peirce A
    Waste Manag; 2015 May; 39():295-304. PubMed ID: 25758908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental impacts and benefits of state-of-the-art technologies for E-waste management.
    Ikhlayel M
    Waste Manag; 2017 Oct; 68():458-474. PubMed ID: 28662843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Life cycle analysis on sequential recovery of copper and gold from waste printed circuit boards.
    Rao MD; Meshram RB; Singh KK; Morrison CA; Love JB
    Waste Manag; 2023 Oct; 171():621-627. PubMed ID: 37837909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health and environmental impacts of increased generation of coal ash and FGD sludges. Report to the Committee on Health and Ecological Effects of Increased Coal Utilization.
    Santhanam CJ; Lunt RR; Johnson SL; Cooper CB; Thayer PS; Jones JW
    Environ Health Perspect; 1979 Dec; 33():131-57. PubMed ID: 540614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental impact assessment of the incineration of municipal solid waste with auxiliary coal in China.
    Zhao Y; Xing W; Lu W; Zhang X; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2012 Oct; 32(10):1989-98. PubMed ID: 22683228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Life cycle assessment of coal mines of diverse scales over time in China.
    Tao M; Lu D; Shi Y; Liu K; Yan D; Memon MB
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Feb; 912():169236. PubMed ID: 38072252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative life cycle assessment of copper and gold recovery from waste printed circuit boards: Pyrometallurgy, chemical leaching and bioleaching.
    Schwartz E; He H; Frost K; Nguyen BH; Ogunseitan OA; Schoenung JM
    J Hazard Mater; 2024 Jul; 473():134545. PubMed ID: 38761760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of electronic waste based mixed metal oxide as novel oxygen carriers for chemical looping co-combustion of high ash coal and rice straw.
    Bhui B; Prabu V
    Waste Manag; 2022 Feb; 138():199-209. PubMed ID: 34902682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bioleaching of pyritic coal wastes: bioprospecting and efficiency of selected consortia.
    Joulian C; Fonti V; Chapron S; Bryan CG; Guezennec AG
    Res Microbiol; 2020; 171(7):260-270. PubMed ID: 32890633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Model of environmental life cycle assessment for coal mining operations.
    Burchart-Korol D; Fugiel A; Czaplicka-Kolarz K; Turek M
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Aug; 562():61-72. PubMed ID: 27092420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward environmentally-benign utilization of nonmetallic fraction of waste printed circuit boards as modifier and precursor.
    Hadi P; Ning C; Ouyang W; Xu M; Lin CS; McKay G
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jan; 35():236-46. PubMed ID: 25445263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Industrial tests of co-combustion of alternative fuel with hard coal in a stoker boiler.
    Wasielewski R; Głód K; Lasek J
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 Mar; 71(3):339-347. PubMed ID: 33074780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Predicting the Recycling Potential and Evaluating the Environmental Benefits of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei].
    Chen P; Shi XQ
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2020 Apr; 41(4):1976-1986. PubMed ID: 32608707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Co-combustion of coal processing waste, oil refining waste and municipal solid waste: Mechanism, characteristics, emissions.
    Glushkov DO; Paushkina KK; Shabardin DP
    Chemosphere; 2020 Feb; 240():124892. PubMed ID: 31546192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.