128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35468445)
1. Inaccurate table height setting affects the organ-specific radiation dose in computed tomography.
Ishita Y; Urikura A; Yoshida T; Takiguchi K; Ikegaya M
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jun; 151():110317. PubMed ID: 35468445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of automatic and manual compensation methods for the calculation of tube currents during off-centered patient positioning with a noise-based automatic exposure control system in computed tomography.
Furukawa Y; Matsubara K; Tsutsumi Y
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Sep; 44(3):823-832. PubMed ID: 34297309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization and implementation of OSL dosimeters for use in evaluating the efficacy of organ-based tube current modulation for CT scans of the face and orbits.
Marsh RM; Silosky M
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1730-8. PubMed ID: 25832062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of overexposure risk when there is a space between the subject and the couch in computed tomography: a phantom study.
Fujiwara Y; Kamihoriuchi Y; Higuchi F; Nakayama S; Ohyama Y; Sasaki T; Watanabe S; Masuda T
Radiol Phys Technol; 2024 Jun; 17(2):561-568. PubMed ID: 38668938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vertical off-centering affects organ dose in chest CT: Evidence from Monte Carlo simulations in anthropomorphic phantoms.
Saltybaeva N; Alkadhi H
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5697-5704. PubMed ID: 28817195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [New Potential Method for Optimizing the ATCM Technique in Pediatric CT Examination].
Yoshiura T; Masuda T; Matsumoto Y; Sato T; Kikuhara Y; Kobayashi Y; Ishibashi T; Oku T; Funama Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(8):802-807. PubMed ID: 32814735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dependency of prescribed CT dose on table height, patient size, and localizer acquisition for one clinical MDCT.
Winslow J; Zhang Y; Koweek L; Samei E
Phys Med; 2018 Nov; 55():56-60. PubMed ID: 30471820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of patient positioning when interpreting CT dose metrics: A phantom study.
Marsh RM; Silosky MS
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1514-1524. PubMed ID: 28133763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH
Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spectral Beam Shaping in Unenhanced Chest CT Examinations: A Phantom Study on Dose Reduction and Image Quality.
Suntharalingam S; Allmendinger T; Blex S; Al-Bayati M; Nassenstein K; Schweiger B; Forsting M; Wetter A
Acad Radiol; 2018 Feb; 25(2):153-158. PubMed ID: 29055683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Absorbed radiation dose in radiosensitive organs during coronary CT angiography using 320-MDCT: effect of maximum tube voltage and heart rate variations.
Nikolic B; Khosa F; Lin PJ; Khan AN; Sarwar S; Yam CS; Court LE; Raptopoulos V; Clouse ME
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1347-54. PubMed ID: 21098194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of measured and estimated maximum skin doses during CT fluoroscopy lung biopsies.
Zanca F; Jacobs A; Crijns W; De Wever W
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):073901. PubMed ID: 24989420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating the CT localizer radiograph: acquisition parameters, patient centring and their combined influence on radiation dose.
Lambert JW; Kumar S; Chen JS; Wang ZJ; Gould RG; Yeh BM
Br J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 88(1048):20140730. PubMed ID: 25608494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Relative Error between Organ Doses and Size-specific Dose Estimates for a Specific Location When the Mean CTDI
Dendo Y; Abe K; Onodera S; Kayano S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2023 Dec; 79(12):1375-1384. PubMed ID: 37880105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Absorbed doses from spiral CT and conventional spiral tomography: a phantom vs. cadaver study.
Bou Serhal C; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Bosmans H; Hermans R; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Oct; 12(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 11564107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inadequate object positioning and improvement of automatic exposure control system calculations based on an empirical algorithm.
Furukawa Y; Matsubara K; Miyati T
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Mar; 44(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 33252720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.
Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lens dose in routine head CT: comparison of different optimization methods with anthropomorphic phantoms.
Nikupaavo U; Kaasalainen T; Reijonen V; Ahonen SM; Kortesniemi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):117-23. PubMed ID: 25539246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Point Organ Radiation Dose in Abdominal CT: Effect of Patient Off-Centering in an Experimental Human Cadaver Study.
Ali Khawaja RD; Singh S; Padole A; Otrakji A; Lira D; Zhang D; Liu B; Primak A; Xu G; Kalra MK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Aug; 175(4):440-449. PubMed ID: 28074019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 0° vs. 180° CT localiser: The effect of vertical off-centring, phantom positioning and tube voltage on dose optimisation in multidetector computed tomography.
Al-Hayek Y; Zheng X; Davidson R; Hayre C; Al-Mousa D; Finlay C; Spuur K
J Med Radiat Sci; 2022 Mar; 69(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 34402591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
