These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35469001)

  • 1. Using virtual global landmark to improve incidental spatial learning.
    Liu J; Singh AK; Lin CT
    Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6744. PubMed ID: 35469001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting the Quality of Spatial Learning via Virtual Global Landmarks.
    Liu J; Singh AK; Lin CT
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022; 30():2418-2425. PubMed ID: 35981074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Redesigning navigational aids using virtual global landmarks to improve spatial knowledge retrieval.
    Liu J; Singh AK; Wunderlich A; Gramann K; Lin CT
    NPJ Sci Learn; 2022 Jul; 7(1):17. PubMed ID: 35853945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modified Navigation Instructions for Spatial Navigation Assistance Systems Lead to Incidental Spatial Learning.
    Gramann K; Hoepner P; Karrer-Gauss K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():193. PubMed ID: 28243219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using a picture (or a thousand words) for supporting spatial knowledge of a complex virtual environment.
    Jaeger AJ; Weisberg SM; Nazareth A; Newcombe NS
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 Jul; 8(1):48. PubMed ID: 37491633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of intentional and incidental learning on acquiring spatial knowledge during navigation.
    van Asselen M; Fritschy E; Postma A
    Psychol Res; 2006 Mar; 70(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 15844006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Route-learning strategies in typical and atypical development; eye tracking reveals atypical landmark selection in Williams syndrome.
    Farran EK; Formby S; Daniyal F; Holmes T; Van Herwegen J
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2016 Oct; 60(10):933-44. PubMed ID: 27634746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial knowledge acquisition in younger and elderly adults: a study in a virtual environment.
    Jansen P; Schmelter A; Heil M
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 20178963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reference frames in learning from maps and navigation.
    Meilinger T; Frankenstein J; Watanabe K; Bülthoff HH; Hölscher C
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):1000-8. PubMed ID: 25416007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Where are we going and where have we been? Examining the effects of maps on spatial learning in an indoor guided navigation task.
    Stites MC; Matzen LE; Gastelum ZN
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Mar; 5(1):13. PubMed ID: 32198712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of navigation may be influenced by retrosplenial cortex-mediated learning of landmark stability.
    Auger SD; Zeidman P; Maguire EA
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Sep; 104():102-112. PubMed ID: 28802770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using spontaneous eye blink-related brain activity to investigate cognitive load during mobile map-assisted navigation.
    Cheng B; Lin E; Wunderlich A; Gramann K; Fabrikant SI
    Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1024583. PubMed ID: 36866330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Landmarks as beacons and associative cues: their role in route learning.
    Waller D; Lippa Y
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):910-24. PubMed ID: 17910176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of visual map complexity on the attentional processing of landmarks.
    Keil J; Edler D; Kuchinke L; Dickmann F
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229575. PubMed ID: 32119712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating Augmented Reality Landmark Cues and Frame of Reference Displays with Virtual Reality.
    Zhao Y; Stefanucci J; Creem-Regehr S; Bodenheimer B
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2023 Feb; PP():. PubMed ID: 37027707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Different "routes" to a cognitive map: dissociable forms of spatial knowledge derived from route and cartographic map learning.
    Zhang H; Zherdeva K; Ekstrom AD
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1106-17. PubMed ID: 24845757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brain connectivity during encoding and retrieval of spatial information: individual differences in navigation skills.
    Sharma G; Gramann K; Chandra S; Singh V; Mittal AP
    Brain Inform; 2017 Sep; 4(3):207-217. PubMed ID: 28510210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-Related Differences in Associative Learning of Landmarks and Heading Directions in a Virtual Navigation Task.
    Zhong JY; Moffat SD
    Front Aging Neurosci; 2016; 8():122. PubMed ID: 27303290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of spatial stability and cue type on spatial learning: Implications for theories of parallel memory systems.
    Buckley MG; Austen JM; Myles LAM; Smith S; Ihssen N; Lew AR; McGregor A
    Cognition; 2021 Sep; 214():104802. PubMed ID: 34225248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How do we get there? Effects of cognitive aging on route memory.
    O'Malley M; Innes A; Wiener JM
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Feb; 46(2):274-284. PubMed ID: 29119542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.