BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35469113)

  • 21. The effectiveness of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: A comparative study between the 7th and 8th editions.
    Lu J; Zheng CH; Cao LL; Li P; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lin JX; Chen QY; Lin M; Huang CM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Dec; 43(12):2349-2356. PubMed ID: 28943179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of the American Joint Commission on Cancer 8th Edition Staging System for Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis.
    Li X; Gou S; Liu Z; Ye Z; Wang C
    Cancer Med; 2018 Mar; 7(3):626-634. PubMed ID: 29380547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A proposal to modify the 8th edition of the UICC staging system for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
    Matsumoto T; Okabayashi T; Sui K; Kimura J; Morita S; Iwata J; Iiyama T; Kubota K; Shimada Y
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 May; 406(3):667-677. PubMed ID: 33855599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation and modification of staging Systems for Poorly Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.
    Wang H; Lin Z; Li G; Zhang D; Yu D; Lin Q; Wang J; Zhao Y; Pi G; Zhang T
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Mar; 20(1):188. PubMed ID: 32138704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition stage system for gastric cancer patients: a population-based analysis.
    He X; Wu W; Lin Z; Ding Y; Si J; Sun LM
    Gastric Cancer; 2018 May; 21(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 29052053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The diversity between curatively resected pancreatic head and body-tail cancers based on the 8th edition of AJCC staging system: a multicenter cohort study.
    Sheng W; Dong M; Wang G; Shi X; Gao W; Wang K; Song H; Shi G; Tan X
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Oct; 19(1):981. PubMed ID: 31640615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. External validation of a modified 8th AJCC TNM system for advanced gastric cancer: Long-term results in southern China.
    Ye J; Ren Y; Wei Z; Hou X; Dai W; Cai S; Tan M; He Y; Yuan Y
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 27(2):146-153. PubMed ID: 29937164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system provide improved prognostic accuracy in T1-2N1M0 postmastectomy breast cancer patients].
    Sun GY; Wang SL; Tang Y; Yang Y; Fang H; Wang JY; Jing H; Zhang JH; Jin J; Song YW; Liu YP; Chen B; Qi SN; Li N; Tang Y; Lu NN; Wang WH; Chen SY; Ren H; Liu XF; Yu ZH; Li YX
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 41(8):615-623. PubMed ID: 31434454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of the 8th edition of AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Results from a non-endemic cohort with 10-year follow-up.
    Wu LR; Zhang XM; Xie XD; Lu Y; Wu JF; He X
    Oral Oncol; 2019 Nov; 98():141-146. PubMed ID: 31586896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gross tumor size using the AJCC 8th ed. T staging criteria does not provide prognostic stratification for neoadjuvant treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
    Rowan DJ; Hartley CP; Aldakkak M; Christians KK; Evans DB; Tsai S; Hagen CE
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2020 Jun; 46():151485. PubMed ID: 32172219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the prognostic value of the new AJCC 8th edition staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma; a need to subclassify stage III?
    Song M; Yoon SB; Lee IS; Hong TH; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Lee MA; Jung ES; Choi MG
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():62-69. PubMed ID: 30326370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of the AJCC 8th lung cancer staging system among patients with small cell lung cancer.
    Abdel-Rahman O
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Apr; 20(4):550-556. PubMed ID: 28808860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Superiority of the 8th edition of the TNM staging system for predicting overall survival in gastric cancer: Comparative analysis of the 7th and 8th editions in a monoinstitutional cohort.
    Wang H; Guo W; Hu Y; Mou T; Zhao L; Chen H; Lin T; Li T; Yu J; Liu H; Li G
    Mol Clin Oncol; 2018 Oct; 9(4):423-431. PubMed ID: 30214731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multi-institutional Validation Study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th Edition) Changes for T and N Staging in Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.
    Allen PJ; Kuk D; Castillo CF; Basturk O; Wolfgang CL; Cameron JL; Lillemoe KD; Ferrone CR; Morales-Oyarvide V; He J; Weiss MJ; Hruban RH; Gönen M; Klimstra DS; Mino-Kenudson M
    Ann Surg; 2017 Jan; 265(1):185-191. PubMed ID: 27163957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modified the 8th AJCC staging system for patients with advanced prostate cancer: a study based on SEER database.
    Sun C; Yang D; Zhu J; Zhou Y; Xiang C; Wu S
    BMC Urol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):185. PubMed ID: 36384495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prognosis of the 8th TNM Staging System for Penile Cancer and Refinement of Prognostication by Incorporating High Risk Human Papillomavirus Status.
    Wang B; Gu W; Wan F; Wei Y; Xiao W; Lu X; Zhang G; Zhou J; Wang Q; Ding X; Azizi M; Spiess PE; Ye D; Zhu Y
    J Urol; 2020 Mar; 203(3):562-569. PubMed ID: 31596650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical Utility of ypTNM Stage Grouping in the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
    Sudo N; Ichikawa H; Muneoka Y; Hanyu T; Kano Y; Ishikawa T; Hirose Y; Miura K; Shimada Y; Nagahashi M; Sakata J; Kobayashi T; Bamba T; Nakagawa S; Kosugi SI; Wakai T
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):650-660. PubMed ID: 33025354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Proposal of a modified American Joint Committee on Cancer staging scheme for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with a lymph node ratio-based N classification: A retrospective cohort study.
    Li HJ; Chen YT; Yuan SQ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Aug; 97(34):e12094. PubMed ID: 30142869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Tumour budding in pancreatic cancer revisited: validation of the ITBCC scoring system.
    Karamitopoulou E; Wartenberg M; Zlobec I; Cibin S; Worni M; Gloor B; Lugli A
    Histopathology; 2018 Jul; 73(1):137-146. PubMed ID: 29495092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Survivals of patients with surgically treated and High-grade pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas: A comparative study between two American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th tumor-node-metastasis staging systems.
    Yang M; Zhang Y; Zeng L; Ke NW; Tan CL; Tian BL; Xiang B; Liu XB
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1054-1060. PubMed ID: 30661921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.