These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35469326)

  • 1. The Electoral Consequences of Affective Polarization? Negative Voting in the 2020 US Presidential Election.
    Garzia D; Ferreira da Silva F
    Am Polit Res; 2022 May; 50(3):303-311. PubMed ID: 35469326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using Elicited Choice Probabilities in Hypothetical Elections to Study Decisions to Vote.
    Delavande A; Manski CF
    Elect Stud; 2015 Jun; 38():28-37. PubMed ID: 25705068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Another issue comes out: gay rights policy voting in recent U.S. presidential elections.
    Rhodebeck LA
    J Homosex; 2015; 62(6):701-34. PubMed ID: 25530286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Life expectancy and voting patterns in the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
    Curtis LH; Hoffman MN; Califf RM; Hammill BG
    SSM Popul Health; 2021 Sep; 15():100840. PubMed ID: 34169139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electoral College bias and the 2020 presidential election.
    Erikson RS; Sigman K; Yao L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Nov; 117(45):27940-27944. PubMed ID: 33106408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries.
    Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in a polarized political system: Lessons from the 2020 election.
    Miller JD; Woods LT; Kalmbach J
    Elect Stud; 2022 Dec; 80():102548. PubMed ID: 36311165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Part of the gender gap in voting for Democrats arises because a higher proportion of women than men voters are Black.
    England P; Hout M; Vilbig K; Wells K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Jun; 120(25):e2221910120. PubMed ID: 37307489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Negativity and Political Behavior: A Theoretical Framework for the Analysis of Negative Voting in Contemporary Democracies.
    Garzia D; Ferreira da Silva F
    Polit Stud Rev; 2022 May; 20(2):282-291. PubMed ID: 35422675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voter emotional responses and voting behaviour in the 2020 US presidential election.
    Lench HC; Fernandez L; Reed N; Raibley E; Levine LJ; Salsedo K
    Cogn Emot; 2024 May; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 38764190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polarization and Democratic Accountability in the 2020 Presidential Election.
    Bitecofer RL
    Society; 2020; 57(5):507-510. PubMed ID: 33144744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Election-Related Post-Traumatic Stress: Evidence from the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Fraser T; Panagopoulos C; Smith K
    Politics Life Sci; 2023 Nov; 42(2):179-204. PubMed ID: 37987568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should I vote-by-mail or in person? The impact of COVID-19 risk factors and partisanship on vote mode decisions in the 2020 presidential election.
    Atkeson LR; Hansen WL; Oliver MT; Maestas CD; Wiemer EC
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274357. PubMed ID: 36107938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study.
    Tang OY; Wong KE; Ganguli R; Zahiri K; Burns NM; Paracha S; Kozel G; Tang KP; Schuur JD
    West J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 22(4):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 35354012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections.
    Mongrain P
    Polit Res Q; 2023 Dec; 76(4):1589-1603. PubMed ID: 37916035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Obesity Prevalence and Voting Behaviors in the 2016 US Presidential Election.
    An R; Ji M
    Am J Health Behav; 2018 Sep; 42(5):21-31. PubMed ID: 30688638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diverging Life Expectancies and Voting Patterns in the 2016 US Presidential Election.
    Bor J
    Am J Public Health; 2017 Oct; 107(10):1560-1562. PubMed ID: 28817322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Asian American Vote in 2020: Indicators of Turnout and Vote Choice.
    Chan N; Nguy JH; Masuoka N
    Polit Behav; 2022 Dec; ():1-25. PubMed ID: 36589468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Distrusting the Process: Electoral Trust, Operational Ideology, and Nonvoting Political Participation in the 2020 American Electorate.
    Fitz EB; Saunders KL
    Public Opin Q; 2024; 88(SI):843-857. PubMed ID: 39109092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.