229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35469793)
41. The role of
Yang J; Yan J; Li J; Yang Z; Zhang H; Zhao Q; Xu W
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2022; 41(2):91-99. PubMed ID: 35292144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Predictive and prognostic potential of volume-based metabolic variables obtained by a baseline
Garcia-Vicente AM; Pérez-Beteta J; Amo-Salas M; Molina D; Jimenez-Londoño GA; Soriano-Castrejón AM; Pena Pardo FJ; Martínez-González A
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2018; 37(2):73-79. PubMed ID: 29102649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Semiquantitative parameters of
Liao XH; Wang RF; Liu M; Chen XQ; Xiong Y; Nong L; Yin L; Zhang BY; DU YJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Oct; 53(2):246-254. PubMed ID: 33879893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Confirmation of the prognostic value of pretherapeutic tumor SUR and MTV in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Hofheinz F; Li Y; Steffen IG; Lin Q; Lili C; Hua W; van den Hoff J; Zschaeck S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1485-1494. PubMed ID: 30949816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Prognostic significance of interim
Lee SY; Seo HJ; Kim S; Eo JS; Oh SC
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2018 Oct; 14(5):e302-e309. PubMed ID: 29226597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Prognostic Importance of Bone Marrow Uptake on Baseline
Soydal C; Koksoy EB; Yasar A; Turgal E; Erdogan BD; Akbulut H; Kucuk NO
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2016 Dec; 31(10):361-365. PubMed ID: 27996313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Prognostic significance of total metabolic tumor volume on
Chang CC; Cho SF; Chuang YW; Lin CY; Chang SM; Hsu WL; Huang YF
Oncotarget; 2017 Nov; 8(59):99587-99600. PubMed ID: 29245926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Prognostic value of the peripheral blood lymphocyte/monocyte ratio combined with
Wu W; Zhao L; Wang Y; Chen P; Yuan X; Miao L; Zhu Y; Mao J; Cai Z; Ji Y; Wang L; Jia T
Curr Probl Cancer; 2024 Feb; 48():101066. PubMed ID: 38364336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The prognostic relationship of 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic and volumetric parameters in metastatic ALK + NSCLC.
Agüloğlu N; Aksu A; Unat DS; Akyol M
Nucl Med Commun; 2022 Dec; 43(12):1217-1224. PubMed ID: 36345766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Prognostic value of
Lee JR; Almuhaimid TM; Roh JL; Oh JS; Kim SJ; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 118(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 30132891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Volumetric parameters on
Liu G; Hu Y; Cheng X; Wang Y; Gu Y; Liu T; Shi H
BMC Cancer; 2019 Aug; 19(1):790. PubMed ID: 31395059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT volumetric parameters in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.
Mayoral M; Fernandez-Martinez A; Vidal L; Fuster D; Aya F; Pavia J; Pons F; Lomeña F; Paredes P
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol; 2016; 35(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 26541072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. FDG PET/CT metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis predict prognosis in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.
Chung HW; Lee KY; Kim HJ; Kim WS; So Y
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2014 Jan; 140(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 24194352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Correlation study on 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic characteristics of primary lesion with clinical stage in lung cancer.
Hu WD; Wang HC; Wang YB; Cui LL; Chen XH
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jun; 65(2):172-177. PubMed ID: 30916535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Role of Various Metabolic Parameters Derived From Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT as Prognostic Markers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.
Sharma A; Mohan A; Bhalla AS; Sharma MC; Vishnubhatla S; Das CJ; Pandey AK; Sekhar Bal C; Patel CD; Sharma P; Agarwal KK; Kumar R
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jan; 43(1):e8-e17. PubMed ID: 29112011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Prognostic value of volumetric parameters measured by F-18 FDG PET/CT in surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer.
Kim K; Kim SJ; Kim IJ; Kim YS; Pak K; Kim H
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Jun; 33(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 22407127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Volumetric PET parameters can predict overall survival in advanced lung adenocarcinoma.
Yanarateş A; Yazici B
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2020; 39(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 31818695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Prognostic value of baseline metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in patients with lymphoma: A meta-analysis.
Guo B; Tan X; Ke Q; Cen H
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210224. PubMed ID: 30625203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Combination of baseline metabolic tumour volume and early response on PET/CT improves progression-free survival prediction in DLBCL.
Mikhaeel NG; Smith D; Dunn JT; Phillips M; Møller H; Fields PA; Wrench D; Barrington SF
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Jul; 43(7):1209-19. PubMed ID: 26902371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Prognostic value of volume-based (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT parameters in patients with clinically node-negative oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma.
Lee SJ; Choi JY; Lee HJ; Baek CH; Son YI; Hyun SH; Moon SH; Kim BT
Korean J Radiol; 2012; 13(6):752-9. PubMed ID: 23118574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
