These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35469808)

  • 1. Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Chen Y; Peng L; Zhang J; Shen H; Luo D
    Urology; 2022 Aug; 166():133-139. PubMed ID: 35469808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S;
    JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Five-year surgical outcomes of transvaginal apical approaches in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse.
    Meyer I; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Richter HE
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Sep; 34(9):2171-2181. PubMed ID: 37039859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of the anterior approach versus posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Bastani P; Tayebi S; Ghabousian A; Salehi-Pourmehr H; Hajebrahimi S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1857-1862. PubMed ID: 35347369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Permanent Compared With Absorbable Suture in Apical Prolapse Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Pollack BL; Popiel P; Toaff MC; Drugge E; Bielawski A; Sacks A; Bibi M; Friedman-Ciment R; LeBron K; Alishahian L; Phillips D; Rubino SR; Pollack S; Khan RS; Khan ES; Pape DM; Grimes CL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 141(2):268-283. PubMed ID: 36649334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Prospective cohort study on the outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation using conventional instruments in treating stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
    Ren C; Song XC; Zhu L; Ai FF; Shi HH; Sun ZJ; Chen J; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):369-373. PubMed ID: 28647958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
    Barber MD; Brubaker L; Burgio KL; Richter HE; Nygaard I; Weidner AC; Menefee SA; Lukacz ES; Norton P; Schaffer J; Nguyen JN; Borello-France D; Goode PS; Jakus-Waldman S; Spino C; Warren LK; Gantz MG; Meikle SF;
    JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(10):1023-34. PubMed ID: 24618964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
    Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concomitant Anterior Repair, Preoperative Prolapse Severity, and Anatomic Prolapse Outcomes After Vaginal Apical Procedures.
    Nager CW; Grimes CL; Nolen TL; Wai CY; Brubaker L; Jeppson PC; Wilson TS; Visco AG; Barber MD; Sutkin G; Norton P; Rardin CR; Arya L; Wallace D; Meikle SF;
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29232267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
    Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of native tissue transvaginal apical approaches in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.
    Meyer I; Whitworth RE; Lukacz ES; Smith AL; Sung VW; Visco AG; Ackenbom MF; Wai CY; Mazloomdoost D; Gantz MG; Richter HE;
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2155-2164. PubMed ID: 32146521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Schulten SF; Detollenaere RJ; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Van Eijndhoven HW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [UTEROSACRAL VERSUS SACROSPINOUS LIGAMENT FIXATION FOLLOWING VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE].
    Nasser-Saman D; Yonis G; Haya N; Lavie O; Abramov Y
    Harefuah; 2022 Jun; 161(6):342-348. PubMed ID: 35734789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical repair of vaginal vault prolapse; a comparison between ipsilateral uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation-a nationwide cohort study.
    Husby KR; Larsen MD; Lose G; Klarskov N
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 32897459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
    Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy of Sacrospinous Fixation or Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Stages III and IV: Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Martins SB; Castro RA; Takano CC; Marquini GV; Oliveira LM; Martins Junior PCF; Dias MM; Girão MJBC; Sartori MGF
    Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2023 Oct; 45(10):e584-e593. PubMed ID: 37944925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination Ba and D Guide the Selection of Operation for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse?
    Li C; Shu H; Dai Z
    J Invest Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(5):438-445. PubMed ID: 30574821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
    Lavelle ES; Giugale LE; Winger DG; Wang L; Carter-Brooks CM; Shepherd JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined anterior vaginal wall mesh with sacrospinous ligament fixation or with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse.
    Heinonen PK; Nieminen K
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Aug; 157(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 21561703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.