BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35471126)

  • 21. What is the structure of perceiver effects? On the importance of global positivity and trait-specificity across personality domains and judgment contexts.
    Rau R; Carlson EN; Back MD; Barranti M; Gebauer JE; Human LJ; Leising D; Nestler S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Mar; 120(3):745-764. PubMed ID: 31829655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The conceptual structure of face impressions.
    Stolier RM; Hehman E; Keller MD; Walker M; Freeman JB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Sep; 115(37):9210-9215. PubMed ID: 30139918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perceptions of persons who wear face coverings are modulated by the perceivers' attitude.
    Leder J; Koßmann L; Carbon CC
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():988546. PubMed ID: 36408397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Aggregating social behavior into person models: perceiver-induced consistency.
    Park B; DeKay ML; Kraus S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1994 Mar; 66(3):437-59. PubMed ID: 8169759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The "frozen in time" effect in evaluations of the dead.
    Eylon D; Allison ST
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Dec; 31(12):1708-17. PubMed ID: 16254090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What really helps? Divergent implications of talking to someone with an empathic mindset versus similar experience for shame and self-evaluation in the wake of an embarrassing event.
    Vorauer JD; Petsnik C
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2020 Jul; 59(3):773-789. PubMed ID: 31402472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mate evaluation theory.
    Eastwick PW; Finkel EJ; Joel S
    Psychol Rev; 2023 Jan; 130(1):211-241. PubMed ID: 35389716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Very first impressions.
    Bar M; Neta M; Linz H
    Emotion; 2006 May; 6(2):269-78. PubMed ID: 16768559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The organizational principles of impression formation.
    Bellucci G
    Cognition; 2023 Oct; 239():105550. PubMed ID: 37506516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differential accuracy in person perception across traits: examination of a functional hypothesis.
    Gangestad SW; Simpson JA; DiGeronimo K; Biek M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1992 Apr; 62(4):688-98. PubMed ID: 1583592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Medial prefrontal dissociations during processing of trait diagnostic and nondiagnostic person information.
    Mitchell JP; Cloutier J; Banaji MR; Macrae CN
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2006 Jun; 1(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 18985100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. We need to move beyond rating scales, white faces and adult perceivers: Invited Commentary on Sutherland & Young (2022), understanding trait impressions from faces.
    Mondloch CJ; Twele AC; Thierry SM
    Br J Psychol; 2023 May; 114(2):504-507. PubMed ID: 36480335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The motivated tactician's juggling act: compatible vs. incompatible impression goals.
    Ruscher JB; Fiske ST; Schnake SB
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2000 Jun; 39 ( Pt 2)():241-56. PubMed ID: 10907098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Positivity in peer perceptions over time: Personality explains variation at zero-acquaintance, popularity explains differential change.
    Rau R; Carlson EN; Dufner M; Geukes K; Kraft L; Krause S; Nikoleizig L; Nestler S; Back MD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Aug; 123(2):423-443. PubMed ID: 35099200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy in Facial Trustworthiness Impressions: Kernel of Truth or Modern Physiognomy? A Meta-Analysis.
    Foo YZ; Sutherland CAM; Burton NS; Nakagawa S; Rhodes G
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1580-1596. PubMed ID: 34609231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stereotypes shape response competition when forming impressions.
    Hester N; Xie SY; Bertin JA; Hehman E
    Group Process Intergroup Relat; 2023 Dec; 26(8):1706-1725. PubMed ID: 38021317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sowing the seeds of stereotypes: Spontaneous inferences about groups.
    Hamilton DL; Chen JM; Ko DM; Winczewski L; Banerji I; Thurston JA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 Oct; 109(4):569-88. PubMed ID: 26414841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dysphoria and social interaction: an integration of behavorial confirmation and interpersonal perspectives.
    Alloy LB; Fedderly SS; Kennedy-Moore E; Cohan CL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1998 Jun; 74(6):1566-79. PubMed ID: 9654760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do People Know How Their Romantic Partner Views Their Emotions? Evidence for Emotion Meta-Accuray and Links with Momentary Romantic Relationship Quality.
    Tissera H; Heyman JL; Human LJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Mar; 49(3):391-404. PubMed ID: 35067107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Valenced appearance-behavior cues affect the extent of impression memory.
    Cassidy BS
    Memory; 2020 May; 28(5):642-654. PubMed ID: 32324098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.