140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35471698)
1. Proclarix, A New Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Campistol M; Morote J; Regis L; Celma A; Planas J; Trilla E
Mol Diagn Ther; 2022 May; 26(3):273-281. PubMed ID: 35471698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PROPOSe: A Real-life Prospective Study of Proclarix, a Novel Blood-based Test to Support Challenging Biopsy Decision-making in Prostate Cancer.
Steuber T; Heidegger I; Kafka M; Roeder MA; Chun F; Preisser F; Palisaar RJ; Hanske J; Budaeus L; Schiess R; Keller T; Semjonow A; Hammerer P; Manka L; Ecke T; Schwentner C; Ohlmann C
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 5(3):321-327. PubMed ID: 33422560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Who with suspected prostate cancer can benefit from Proclarix after multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging?
Morote J; Campistol M; Regis L; Celma A; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Roche S; Mast R; Santamaria A; Planas J; Trilla E
Int J Biol Markers; 2022 Jun; 37(2):218-223. PubMed ID: 35200058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer by combining Proclarix with magnetic resonance imaging.
Morote J; Pye H; Campistol M; Celma A; Regis L; Semidey M; de Torres I; Mast R; Planas J; Santamaria A; Trilla E; Athanasiou A; Singh S; Heavey S; Stopka-Farooqui U; Freeman A; Haider A; Schiess R; Whitaker HC; Punwani S; Ahmed HU; Emberton M
BJU Int; 2023 Aug; 132(2):188-195. PubMed ID: 36855895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Efficacy of Proclarix to Select Appropriate Candidates for Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Derived Prostate Biopsies in Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer.
Morote J; Campistol M; Celma A; Regis L; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Roche S; Mast R; Santamaría A; Planas J; Trilla E
World J Mens Health; 2022 Apr; 40(2):270-279. PubMed ID: 35021312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Proclarix in the diagnostic work-up of prostate cancer.
Kaufmann B; Fischer S; Athanasiou A; Lautenbach N; Wittig A; Bieri U; Schmid FA; von Stauffenberg F; Scherer T; Eberli D; Gorin MA; Schiess R; Poyet C
BJUI Compass; 2024 Mar; 5(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 38371198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between Proclarix and the Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer.
Campistol M; Triquell M; Regis L; Celma A; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Mast R; Mendez O; Planas J; Trilla E; Morote J
Mol Diagn Ther; 2023 Jul; 27(4):487-498. PubMed ID: 37081322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New strategy for the identification of prostate cancer: The combination of Proclarix and the prostate health index.
Terracciano D; La Civita E; Athanasiou A; Liotti A; Fiorenza M; Cennamo M; Crocetto F; Tennstedt P; Schiess R; Haese A; Ferro M; Steuber T
Prostate; 2022 Nov; 82(15):1469-1476. PubMed ID: 35971798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving the Early Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Men in the Challenging Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Category.
Morote J; Campistol M; Triquell M; Celma A; Regis L; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Mast R; Santamaria A; Planas J; Trilla E
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Mar; 37():38-44. PubMed ID: 35243388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Proclarix, PSA Density and MRI-ERSPC Risk Calculator to Select Patients for Prostate Biopsy after mpMRI.
Campistol M; Morote J; Triquell M; Regis L; Celma A; de Torres I; Semidey ME; Mast R; Santamaría A; Planas J; Trilla E
Cancers (Basel); 2022 May; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 35681685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer: What's Next?
Panebianco V; Barchetti G; Simone G; Del Monte M; Ciardi A; Grompone MD; Campa R; Indino EL; Barchetti F; Sciarra A; Leonardo C; Gallucci M; Catalano C
Eur Urol; 2018 Jul; 74(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 29566957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do all patients with suspicious prostate cancer need Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging before prostate biopsy?
Teixeira Anacleto S; Neves Alberto J; Carvalho Dias E; Sousa Passos P; Cerqueira Alves M
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Mar; 94(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 35352522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Who Benefits from Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Suspicion of Prostate Cancer?
Morote J; Celma A; Roche S; de Torres IM; Mast R; Semedey ME; Regis L; Planas J
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 2(6):664-669. PubMed ID: 31411977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to optimize follow-up in patients with a suspicious multiparametric MRI and a subsequent negative targeted prostate biopsy. Results from a large, single-institution series.
Barletta F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Brembilla G; Sorce G; Pellegrino F; Scuderi S; Cannoletta D; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):103.e17-103.e24. PubMed ID: 34688534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Russo F; Mazzetti S; Regge D; Ambrosini I; Giannini V; Manfredi M; De Luca S; Bollito E; Porpiglia F
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 33893066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The "Is mpMRI Enough" or IMRIE Study: A Multicentre Evaluation of Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared with Biopsy.
Stonier T; Simson N; Shah T; Lobo N; Amer T; Lee SM; Bass E; Chau E; Grey A; McCartan N; Acher P; Ahmad I; Arumainayagam N; Brown D; Chapman A; Elf D; Hartington T; Ibrahim I; Leung H; Liyanage S; Lovegrove C; Malthouse T; Mateen B; Mistry K; Morrison I; Nalagatla S; Persad R; Pope A; Sokhi H; Syed H; Tadtayev S; Tharmaratnam M; Qteishat A; Miah S; Emberton M; Moore C; Walton T; Eddy B; Ahmed HU
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):1027-1034. PubMed ID: 33046412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nomogram predicting prostate cancer in patients with negative prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance.
Chen M; Wang R; Zhang T; Zhang X; Wan Y; Fu X
Future Oncol; 2022 Apr; 18(12):1473-1483. PubMed ID: 35105154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Protocol for the PRIMARY clinical trial, a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study of the additive diagnostic value of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic setting for men being investigated for prostate cancer.
Amin A; Blazevski A; Thompson J; Scheltema MJ; Hofman MS; Murphy D; Lawrentschuk N; Sathianathen N; Kapoor J; Woo HH; Chalasani V; Rasiah K; van Leeuwen PJ; Tang R; Cusick T; Stricker P; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):515-524. PubMed ID: 31957122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
