These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35472021)

  • 21. A non-coding indel polymorphism in the
    Jardine MD; Ruzicka F; Diffley C; Fowler K; Reuter M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 May; 288(1950):20202958. PubMed ID: 33975471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evidence for overdominant selection maintaining X-linked fitness variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Connallon T; Knowles LL
    Evolution; 2006 Jul; 60(7):1445-53. PubMed ID: 16929661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. No evidence that polyandry benefits females in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Brown WD; Bjork A; Schneider K; Pitnick S
    Evolution; 2004 Jun; 58(6):1242-50. PubMed ID: 15266973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sexual conflict and environmental change: trade-offs within and between the sexes during the evolution of desiccation resistance.
    Kwan L; Bedhomme S; Prasad NG; Chippindale AK
    J Genet; 2008 Dec; 87(4):383-94. PubMed ID: 19147928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Arbuthnott D; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2012 Jul; 66(7):2127-37. PubMed ID: 22759290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Variation in the post-mating fitness landscape in fruit flies.
    Fricke C; Chapman T
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Jul; 30(7):1250-1261. PubMed ID: 28391616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reduced genetic variance among high fitness individuals: inferring stabilizing selection on male sexual displays in Drosophila serrata.
    Sztepanacz JL; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2012 Oct; 66(10):3101-10. PubMed ID: 23025601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sexual selection and the random union of gametes: testing for a correlation in fitness between mates in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Am Nat; 2009 Nov; 174(5):613-22. PubMed ID: 19757995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do males pay for sex? Sex-specific selection coefficients suggest not.
    Prokop ZM; Prus MA; Gaczorek TS; Sychta K; Palka JK; Plesnar-Bielak A; Skarboń M
    Evolution; 2017 Mar; 71(3):650-661. PubMed ID: 27943275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The contribution of the mitochondrial genome to sex-specific fitness variance.
    Smith SRT; Connallon T
    Evolution; 2017 May; 71(5):1417-1424. PubMed ID: 28369844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The genetic basis for mating-induced sex differences in starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Jang T; Lee KP
    J Insect Physiol; 2015 Nov; 82():56-65. PubMed ID: 26358400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females.
    Long TA; Pischedda A; Stewart AD; Rice WR
    PLoS Biol; 2009 Dec; 7(12):e1000254. PubMed ID: 19997646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mating frequency and inclusive fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Priest NK; Galloway LF; Roach DA
    Am Nat; 2008 Jan; 171(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 18171147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Male sex drive and the maintenance of sex: evidence from Drosophila.
    Singh RS; Artieri CG
    J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S100-6. PubMed ID: 20212005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Time spent in distinct life history stages has sex-specific effects on reproductive fitness in wild Atlantic salmon.
    Mobley KB; Granroth-Wilding H; Ellmén M; Orell P; Erkinaro J; Primmer CR
    Mol Ecol; 2020 Mar; 29(6):1173-1184. PubMed ID: 32077545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Female-specific resource limitation does not make the opportunity for selection more female biased.
    Martinossi-Allibert I; Liljestrand Rönn J; Immonen E
    Evolution; 2020 Dec; 74(12):2714-2724. PubMed ID: 33043452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Experimentally induced intrasexual mating competition and sex-specific evolution in female and male nematodes.
    Stångberg J; Immonen E; Moreno PP; Bolund E
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Dec; 33(12):1677-1688. PubMed ID: 32945028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. From Drift to Draft: How Much Do Beneficial Mutations Actually Contribute to Predictions of Ohta's Slightly Deleterious Model of Molecular Evolution?
    Chen J; Glémin S; Lascoux M
    Genetics; 2020 Apr; 214(4):1005-1018. PubMed ID: 32015019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genetic architecture of two fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster: ovariole number and thorax length.
    Telonis-Scott M; McIntyre LM; Wayne ML
    Genetica; 2005 Nov; 125(2-3):211-22. PubMed ID: 16247693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.